ESQ
Price
$115.31
Change
+$1.87 (+1.65%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.4B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCF
Price
$21.09
Change
-$0.16 (-0.75%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESQ vs FCF

ESQ vs FCF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESQ vs. FCF commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESQ is a Hold and FCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ESQ: $115.31 vs. FCF: $21.09)
Brand notoriety: ESQ and FCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESQ: 59% vs. FCF: 80%
Market capitalization -- ESQ: $1.4B vs. FCF: $2.13B
ESQ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.4B. FCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than ESQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the short-term than FCF.

Price Growth

ESQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -9.96% price change this week, while FCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

FCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($2.13B) has a higher market cap than ESQ($1.4B). ESQ has higher P/E ratio than FCF: ESQ (19.00) vs FCF (12.86). FCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.779 vs. ESQ (13.573). FCF has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. ESQ (614K). ESQ has less debt than FCF: ESQ (49K) vs FCF (155M). FCF has higher revenues than ESQ: FCF (538M) vs ESQ (160M).
ESQFCFESQ / FCF
Capitalization1.4B2.13B66%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.57327.77949%
P/E Ratio19.0012.86148%
Revenue160M538M30%
Total Cash614K118M1%
Total Debt49K155M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESQ vs FCF: Fundamental Ratings
ESQ
FCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5091
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
323
SMR RATING
1..100
4342
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4149
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESQ (96) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESQFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSSC91.320.74
+0.82%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
TPIF38.920.28
+0.72%
Timothy Plan International ETF
EVHY52.170.04
+0.08%
Eaton Vance High Yield ETF
TVE23.50-0.01
-0.04%
Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029
MSFD10.64-0.04
-0.38%
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF

ESQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESQ has been closely correlated with NBTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESQ jumps, then NBTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESQ
1D Price
Change %
ESQ100%
+1.65%
NBTB - ESQ
71%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
BUSE - ESQ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
PRK - ESQ
68%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
PEBO - ESQ
68%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
FCF - ESQ
68%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More

FCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCF
1D Price
Change %
FCF100%
-0.75%
UBSI - FCF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
NWBI - FCF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
STBA - FCF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
PRK - FCF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
CPF - FCF
85%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More