Advertisement
ET vs WES
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs. Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Energy Transfer LP (ET) holds a significantly larger market capitalization of $68.6 billion compared to Western Midstream Partners, LP's (WES) $17.2 billion, offering greater scale and diversification.
- ET has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of 23.19% versus WES's 11.51%, reflecting robust momentum in recent market activity.
- WES provides a higher dividend yield at 8.82%, appealing to income-focused investors, compared to ET's 6.70%.
- Both stocks operate in the midstream energy sector with fee-based contracts mitigating commodity price volatility, but ET shows broader exposure across natural gas, NGLs, and crude.
- Recent analyst sentiment remains positive for both, with ET benefiting from earnings anticipation and WES from distribution increases.
Introduction
Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) are prominent master limited partnerships (MLPs) in the midstream energy sector, focusing on pipelines, gathering, and processing. This stock comparison is relevant for income-oriented investors seeking high dividend yields and traders monitoring energy infrastructure amid fluctuating commodity prices and infrastructure demand. Both have demonstrated resilience in recent market conditions, with distinct profiles in scale, yield, and performance, aiding decisions on relative positioning in portfolios.
ET Overview and Recent Performance
Energy Transfer LP (ET) is a diversified midstream company operating pipelines for natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, and refined products across the U.S. In recent weeks, ET has traded near its 52-week high of $20.28, closing around $19.94 with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 16.48 and earnings per share (EPS) of $1.21. Year-to-date gains of 23.19% outpace broader markets, driven by strong cash flows, a forward dividend of $1.34, and positive analyst updates ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 5. Sentiment has been bolstered by industry outlooks highlighting pipeline demand despite sector headwinds.
WES Overview and Recent Performance
Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) owns and operates midstream assets, including gathering, processing, and transportation primarily in the Permian and Eagle Ford basins. Recently, shares have hovered in the middle of their 52-week range ($35.25–$44.74), closing near $42.16 with a lower P/E ratio of 14.15 and EPS of $2.98. Year-to-date returns stand at 11.51%, supported by a quarterly distribution increase to $0.93 per unit (annualized $3.72, yield 8.82%) and announcements of 2027 growth projects. Performance reflects steady cash generation and valuation interest amid midstream payout trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of 351 AI Trading Bots, which analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using technical and fundamental signals. Only the most suitable for current volatility—low, medium, or high—are featured among the 25 trending bots, showcasing diverse strategies like swing trading, scalping (timeframes from 5min to 60min), and sector focus (e.g., energy, semiconductors). Stats include annualized returns ranging from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30%–88.33%, profit factors up to 11.70, and drawdowns managed effectively. These bots offer real-time alerts and brokerage integration for varied risk profiles. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both ET and WES rely on fee-based contracts in midstream operations, reducing direct commodity exposure, but ET's broader model spans intrastate transport, interstate pipelines, and NGL fractionation, contrasting WES's emphasis on gathering and processing in prolific basins. Growth drivers include ET's extensive network expansions and WES's targeted 2027 projects. Recent momentum favors ET with superior YTD and one-year returns, while WES trades at a discount on valuation metrics. Risk factors like regulatory shifts and energy demand apply equally, though ET's size provides relative stability. Market sentiment tilts toward ET for scale amid analyst upgrades, versus WES's yield advantage.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors ET over WES, based on stronger trend consistency, higher year-to-date momentum, larger-scale stability, and near-term catalysts like upcoming earnings. While WES offers a compelling higher yield, ET's relative positioning suggests greater probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a StrongBuy and WES is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWES’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WES’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WES’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.65% price change this week, while WES (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
WES is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.49% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| ET | WES | ET / WES | |
| Capitalization | 65.6B | 17.6B | 373% |
| EBITDA | 15.9B | 2.41B | 660% |
| Gain YTD | 19.846 | 17.889 | 111% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.89 | 14.66 | 108% |
| Revenue | 92.3B | 4.05B | 2,279% |
| Total Cash | 951M | 647M | 147% |
| Total Debt | 71.1B | 8.71B | 817% |
ET | WES | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WES (5) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to WES’s over the last 12 months.
WES's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (16) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
WES's SMR Rating (26) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (66) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.
WES's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (51) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
WES's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (39) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
| ET | WES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | 11 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 7 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
ET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
WES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WES has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WES jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WES | 100% | +1.43% | ||
| OKE - WES | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| ET - WES | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| TRGP - WES | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| PAA - WES | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| PAGP - WES | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||