ET
Price
$19.67
Change
-$0.12 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.65B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WES
Price
$44.62
Change
-$0.25 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.44B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs WES

ET vs WES Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs. Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both ET and WES operate in the midstream energy sector, focusing on natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) transportation and processing through fee-based contracts that limit direct commodity price exposure.
  • In recent market activity, ET has shown stronger year-to-date momentum with gains exceeding 16%, supported by robust Q1 2026 volume growth and raised guidance, while WES delivered solid but comparatively moderated returns around 14% year-to-date.
  • ET benefits from a larger, more diversified asset base spanning approximately 140,000 miles of pipelines across multiple basins, whereas WES maintains a more concentrated presence primarily in the Permian and Rocky Mountain regions.
  • Recent sentiment for ET reflects analyst upgrades and expansion agreements, contributing to relative outperformance versus broader market indices in the past several weeks.
  • WES emphasizes stable cash flows from gathering and processing assets, with limited new catalysts reported in the recent period compared to ET's volume and contract expansions.
  • Risk profiles remain similar, centered on regulatory, operational, and energy demand factors, though ET's scale provides broader geographic diversification.

Introduction

Midstream energy companies play a critical role in the U.S. energy infrastructure by transporting and processing hydrocarbons. ET and WES represent two established players in this space, offering investors exposure to fee-based revenue streams that can provide relative stability amid fluctuating commodity prices. This comparison appeals to income-focused investors seeking dividend yields, growth-oriented traders monitoring volume trends and analyst sentiment, and those evaluating sector positioning within the broader energy market. The analysis examines recent performance, business fundamentals, and observable market factors to highlight relative strengths and trade-offs.

ET Overview and Recent Performance

Energy Transfer LP operates one of the largest midstream networks in North America, with approximately 140,000 miles of pipelines handling natural gas, crude oil, NGLs, and refined products across 44 states. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited positive momentum, with year-to-date gains surpassing 16% amid strong first-quarter 2026 volume records in NGL fractionation and crude transportation. Recent developments include new gas supply and NGL agreements that added processing capacity, alongside raised 2026 earnings guidance. Market sentiment has benefited from analyst upgrades citing growth outlook in gas and liquids segments, contributing to relative outperformance against the S&P 500 in the recent period. The company's scale and diversified operations have supported steady trading activity around the $19.80 level.

WES Overview and Recent Performance

Western Midstream Partners, LP focuses on gathering, processing, and transporting natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, and produced water, primarily in the Delaware Basin and Rocky Mountain regions. Its operations rely heavily on fee-based contracts that help insulate cash flows from commodity volatility. In recent market activity, the stock has posted year-to-date returns near 14%, with one-year gains in the mid-teens range, reflecting stable operational performance. Recent developments have centered on routine items such as tax schedule availability rather than major new expansions. The unit price has traded around the $45 level, with performance characterized by consistency rather than sharp momentum shifts during the past several weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only the strongest and most suitable bots earn placement in this trending section, with available statistics often including ranges such as win rates above 60% in select cases, average returns per trade between 1-5%, and drawdowns managed below 10-15% depending on the strategy. Each bot features distinct trading styles, risk parameters, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options aligned with their objectives. For more details on these AI-driven tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ET maintains a significantly larger and more geographically diversified asset footprint than WES, enabling broader exposure to multiple production basins and supporting recent volume-driven growth. In contrast, WES operates with a more focused regional emphasis, which can offer operational efficiency but potentially higher concentration risk. Growth drivers for ET include recent contract expansions and earnings guidance increases, contributing to stronger near-term momentum compared with WES's steadier profile. Both companies benefit from midstream sector tailwinds tied to U.S. energy production, yet ET has attracted more visible analyst attention in recent weeks. Risk factors such as regulatory changes and infrastructure maintenance costs apply to both, though ET's scale may provide greater resilience. Market sentiment currently tilts toward ET due to observable catalysts, while WES emphasizes predictable distributions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, recent volume catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a probabilistic edge to ET in the current environment. Stronger year-to-date performance, expanded agreements, and positive analyst revisions provide measurable support for this assessment, though outcomes remain subject to broader market and sector dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ET vs. WES commentary
Jul 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a StrongBuy and WES is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2026
Stock price -- (ET: $19.66 vs. WES: $44.62)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. WES: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 69% vs. WES: 67%
Market capitalization -- ET: $67.65B vs. WES: $18.44B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $67.65B. WES’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $18.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $118.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWES’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WES’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, WES is a better buy in the long-term than ET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WES’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WES is a better buy in the short-term than ET.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while WES (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

WES is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.19% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($67.7B) has a higher market cap than WES($18.4B). ET has higher P/E ratio than WES: ET (16.38) vs WES (14.68). ET YTD gains are higher at: 23.554 vs. WES (18.021). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.9B vs. WES (2.41B). ET has more cash in the bank: 951M vs. WES (647M). WES has less debt than ET: WES (8.71B) vs ET (71.1B). ET has higher revenues than WES: ET (92.3B) vs WES (4.05B).
ETWESET / WES
Capitalization67.7B18.4B368%
EBITDA15.9B2.41B660%
Gain YTD23.55418.021131%
P/E Ratio16.3814.68112%
Revenue92.3B4.05B2,279%
Total Cash951M647M147%
Total Debt71.1B8.71B817%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs WES: Fundamental Ratings
ET
WES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7113
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
153
SMR RATING
1..100
6627
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2929
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WES (5) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to WES’s over the last 12 months.

WES's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (15) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

WES's SMR Rating (27) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (66) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.

WES's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

WES's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (29) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETWES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLSK12.85-0.04
-0.31%
CleanSpark
SQM73.19-0.90
-1.21%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
SATL4.54-0.07
-1.52%
Satellogic Inc
MASK1.85-0.04
-2.12%
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd
VWAV4.22-0.18
-4.09%
VisionWave Holdings Inc

WES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WES has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WES jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WES
1D Price
Change %
WES100%
-0.56%
OKE - WES
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
PAA - WES
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
ET - WES
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
TRGP - WES
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
PAGP - WES
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More