ETD
Price
$21.02
Change
-$0.31 (-1.45%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
537.57M
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLXS
Price
$85.23
Change
+$1.07 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
344.36M
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ETD vs FLXS

ETD vs FLXS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ETD vs. FLXS commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETD is a Hold and FLXS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ETD vs FLXS: Fundamental Ratings
ETD
FLXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9832
SMR RATING
1..100
7644
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ETD's Valuation (2) in the Home Furnishings industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLXS (73). This means that ETD’s stock grew significantly faster than FLXS’s over the last 12 months.

FLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Home Furnishings industry is significantly better than the same rating for ETD (98). This means that FLXS’s stock grew significantly faster than ETD’s over the last 12 months.

FLXS's SMR Rating (44) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ETD (76). This means that FLXS’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

FLXS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ETD (47). This means that FLXS’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

ETD's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as FLXS (52). This means that ETD’s stock grew similarly to FLXS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETDFLXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ETD: $21.02 vs. FLXS: $85.23)
Brand notoriety: ETD and FLXS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ETD: 96% vs. FLXS: 54%
Market capitalization -- ETD: $537.57M vs. FLXS: $344.36M
ETD [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $537.57M. FLXS’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $344.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $6.58K to $26.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ETD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FLXS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ETD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLXS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLXS is a better buy in the long-term than ETD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLXS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ETD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLXS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ETD and FLXS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ETD (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while FLXS (@Home Furnishings) price change was +4.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ETD is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

FLXS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+0.68% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ETD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLXS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RKSIX12.560.08
+0.64%
Rockefeller US Small Cap Core I
JSGIX32.040.08
+0.25%
JHancock U.S. Growth I
VADGX31.890.01
+0.03%
Vanguard Advice Select Dividend Gr Admrl
MYIMX27.60-0.01
-0.04%
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value Y
MIEIX43.42-0.08
-0.18%
MFS International Equity R6

ETD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETD has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ETD jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETD
1D Price
Change %
ETD100%
+1.72%
MHK - ETD
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
LZB - ETD
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
TILE - ETD
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.89%
MBC - ETD
42%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
WHR - ETD
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
More

FLXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLXS has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLXS jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLXS
1D Price
Change %
FLXS100%
+3.70%
ETD - FLXS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
TILE - FLXS
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.89%
MBC - FLXS
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
HNI - FLXS
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
MHK - FLXS
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
More