Advertisement
EVR vs GS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Evercore Inc. (EVR) vs. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Evercore Inc. (EVR) operates as a boutique investment bank focused primarily on advisory services, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) maintains a diversified global franchise spanning investment banking, markets, asset and wealth management, and consumer platforms.
- In recent market activity, EVR shares have experienced downward pressure amid broader sector rotation, trading near $281 after declines of approximately 8% over the past month, whereas GS shares have shown relative resilience around $1,029 with positive year-to-date performance.
- Evercore reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted net revenues of approximately $1 billion, reflecting 19% year-over-year growth driven by advisory and underwriting activity, though earnings per share faced some pressure from elevated expenses.
- Goldman Sachs delivered record second-quarter 2026 results with net revenues of $20.3 billion and diluted earnings per share of $20.98, supported by strength across global banking and markets segments.
- Both firms benefit from elevated merger-and-acquisition (M&A) pipelines, yet GS holds advantages in scale, diversification, and exposure to growth themes such as artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and wealth management inflows.
- Relative positioning favors stability and breadth for the larger institution in the current environment, while the boutique firm offers higher return-on-equity (ROE) metrics tied to its focused advisory model.
Introduction
Evercore Inc. (EVR) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) represent two distinct profiles within the capital markets sector. The former functions as a specialized advisory-focused investment bank, while the latter operates as a full-service global financial institution. This comparison provides traders and investors with an objective view of relative performance, business drivers, and market positioning. Market participants seeking exposure to investment banking cycles, M&A trends, or differentiated risk-return profiles may find the analysis relevant for portfolio construction and sector allocation decisions.
EVR Overview and Recent Performance
Evercore Inc. delivers advisory services in mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, and capital markets, alongside equities and investment management offerings. In recent weeks, the stock has traded lower amid sector-wide adjustments, closing near $281 following a roughly 8% decline over the trailing month. Second-quarter 2026 results showed adjusted net revenues rising 19% year-over-year to approximately $1 billion, fueled by advisory fee growth and increased transaction activity in healthcare, technology, and industrials. A new senior managing director hire in the healthcare investment banking group was announced on September 1, 2026, supporting client expansion efforts. Elevated non-compensation expenses and variability in deal timing have tempered sentiment despite strong underlying backlog levels.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. provides investment banking, institutional client services, asset and wealth management, and consumer platforms on a global scale. Shares have demonstrated resilience in recent market activity, trading around $1,029 as of mid-September 2026 with positive year-to-date returns. Second-quarter 2026 delivered record net revenues of $20.3 billion and diluted earnings per share of $20.98, reflecting broad-based strength in global banking and markets, including equities and fixed income, currencies, and commodities (FICC). Momentum in AI-related capital formation, alternatives fundraising, and wealth management inflows has supported positioning. The firm also announced a dividend increase and continued share repurchases, underscoring capital return discipline.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from a library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent performance metrics, and suitable risk profiles earn placement in this dynamic roster. Available bots span diverse strategies, timeframes, and ticker universes, with historical statistics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdown measures that vary widely by model. Traders can review detailed backtested and live performance data to identify bots matching specific objectives. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Evercore Inc. (EVR) maintains a focused advisory-centric model that delivers higher return-on-equity (ROE) efficiency but exposes the firm to greater concentration risk in deal flow timing. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) offers broader revenue diversification across markets, asset management, and consumer segments, providing more stable earnings through market cycles. Recent momentum favors GS given record quarterly results and explicit exposure to AI infrastructure and large-scale M&A mandates. Risk factors for EVR include sensitivity to boutique-scale expense ratios and transaction conversion variability, while GS contends with larger regulatory and operational complexity. Sector exposure remains aligned in capital markets, yet market sentiment currently assigns greater stability to the diversified platform amid ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, diversification benefits, and positioning within growth areas like AI-related activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic preference toward The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) over Evercore Inc. (EVR). The larger franchise exhibits stronger recent trend stability and broader catalyst exposure, though both names remain subject to investment banking cycle dynamics and market volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVR is a Hold and GS is a Hold.
| EVR | GS | EVR / GS | |
| Capitalization | 10.1B | 274B | 4% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.187 | 8.736 | -254% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.79 | 14.55 | 102% |
| Revenue | 4.71B | 66.2B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 442M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.09B | 475B | 0% |
EVR | GS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (80). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVR (48). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (27). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (77). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (95). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
| EVR | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | 17 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while GS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EVR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.62% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
EVR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
EVR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then MC could also see price increases.
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.