EVR
Price
$310.33
Change
-$8.45 (-2.65%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.26B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MC
Price
$67.29
Change
-$2.16 (-3.11%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.14B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EVR vs MC

EVR vs MC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVR vs. MC commentary
Aug 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVR is a Hold and MC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2026
Stock price -- (EVR: $310.33 vs. MC: $67.29)
Brand notoriety: EVR and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVR: 88% vs. MC: 72%
Market capitalization -- EVR: $12.26B vs. MC: $5.14B
EVR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.26B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than EVR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the short-term than EVR.

Price Growth

EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

EVR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

MC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVR($12.3B) has a higher market cap than MC($5.15B). MC has higher P/E ratio than EVR: MC (23.45) vs EVR (17.47). MC YTD gains are higher at: -0.137 vs. EVR (-8.323). MC has less debt than EVR: MC (263M) vs EVR (1.1B). EVR has higher revenues than MC: EVR (4.55B) vs MC (1.57B).
EVRMCEVR / MC
Capitalization12.3B5.15B239%
EBITDAN/A304M-
Gain YTD-8.323-0.1376,055%
P/E Ratio17.4723.4575%
Revenue4.55B1.57B289%
Total CashN/A208M-
Total Debt1.1B263M417%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EVR vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
EVR
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1716
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4158
SMR RATING
1..100
2323
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8667
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for EVR (84). This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.

EVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (58). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

EVR's SMR Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (23). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (61). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.

MC's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (86). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVRMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EVR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBO19.670.64
+3.36%
Invesco DB Oil
COSW39.950.30
+0.76%
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
SH32.240.06
+0.19%
ProShares Short S&P500
FNDF54.63N/A
N/A
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
IWMW39.63-0.19
-0.48%
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF

EVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVR
1D Price
Change %
EVR100%
-2.65%
MC - EVR
84%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
RJF - EVR
80%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
PIPR - EVR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
LAZ - EVR
76%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
PJT - EVR
73%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
More

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-3.11%
EVR - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
PJT - MC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
HLI - MC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
RJF - MC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
LAZ - MC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
More