Evercore Inc. (EVR) and Moelis & Company (MC) are prominent independent investment banks specializing in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory, restructuring, and capital markets. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors tracking the capital markets sector, where renewed M&A activity and market volatility have driven performance. Traders seeking exposure to boutique firms with strong advisory franchises may evaluate their relative momentum, financial metrics, and positioning in the current environment of improving economic conditions and deal flow.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) provides sophisticated advisory services in M&A, strategic advisory, and equity capital markets, serving high-profile clients globally. In recent market activity, EVR shares have exhibited strong upward momentum, with a roughly 20.71% gain over the past month and trading near $344.30, within a 52-week range of $192.77 to $388.71. Key influences include robust Q4 fiscal 2025 results, with revenues of $1.3 billion (up 32.4% yoy) exceeding expectations, driven by heightened advisory fees amid recovering deal volumes. Positive analyst updates, such as Goldman Sachs' "Buy" rating with a $374 target, have bolstered sentiment, reflecting confidence in sustained profitability (15.35% profit margin) and return on equity (ROE) of 30.07%.
Moelis & Company (MC) is a leading advisory firm focused on M&A, restructuring, and capital placement for corporations and governments worldwide. Shares have shown resilience in recent weeks, rising approximately 23.98% over the past month to around $68.08, within a 52-week range of $51.06 to $78.22. Performance has been supported by solid Q4 fiscal 2025 earnings, with revenue at $487.94 million and EPS of $1.13 beating estimates, alongside share buybacks. Strong fundamentals, including a 15.36% profit margin and elevated ROE of 44.77%, have sustained investor interest despite some quarterly EPS softness, with market sentiment buoyed by "Overweight" ratings like Morgan Stanley's.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, corridor take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL), and multi-ticker portfolios, with timeframes from 5-minute to 55-day holds and volatility filters (low to high). Standout stats include annualized returns ranging from +15.30% to +167.52%, win rates of 48.27% to 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Popular themes cover semiconductors, leveraged ETFs, aerospace, and energy. Ideal for current conditions, these bots adapt to market shifts—explore them to align with your trading style and enhance decision-making.
Both EVR and MC share similar business models as boutique investment banks emphasizing M&A advisory over lending, exposing them to cyclical deal flow and economic cycles. EVR edges in scale with a $13.64B market cap versus $5B for MC, supporting broader sector exposure. Growth drivers favor EVR's 32.2% quarterly revenue growth and 45.2% EPS expansion against MC's more modest 11.2% and -1.7%. Recent momentum is comparable short-term but EVR leads longer-term (74.58% 1-year return vs. 35.16%). Risk factors include dependency on M&A volumes and interest rate sensitivity; EVR via forward P/E (19.12 vs. 20.70) and analyst upside.
Tickeron’s AI would currently lean toward EVR based on consistent trend strength, superior recent revenue and EPS growth, and favorable relative valuation metrics like lower forward P/E alongside higher analyst targets. While MC offers strong profitability and ROE, EVR's scale and momentum position it probabilistically better in the prevailing capital markets upswing.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.37%.
EVR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| EVR | MC | EVR / MC | |
| Capitalization | 13.1B | 5.15B | 254% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 290M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.273 | 0.708 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.10 | 24.41 | 78% |
| Revenue | 4.55B | 1.53B | 298% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 80.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.16B | 267M | 433% |
EVR | MC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MC's Valuation (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for EVR (87). This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (52). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's SMR Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (21). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (43). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.
MC's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (69). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
| EVR | MC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MHY | 25.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Man Active High Yield ETF | |||
| LAPR | 25.29 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
| Innovator Premium Inc 15 Bffr ETF - Aprl | |||
| SPEU | 54.26 | -1.06 | -1.92% |
| State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Europe ETF | |||
| FTEC | 275.32 | -18.10 | -6.17% |
| Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF | |||
| FNGG | 227.82 | -25.77 | -10.16% |
| Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then MC could also see price increases.