It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.90% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +7.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +100.58%.
EVR is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
EVR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EVR | SGLC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago76% | 6 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 13 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FCSH | 24.47 | N/A | N/A |
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corp ETF | |||
FLBL | 23.81 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
Franklin Senior Loan ETF | |||
FLRG | 38.35 | -0.12 | -0.32% |
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | |||
FTIF | 22.12 | -0.09 | -0.38% |
First Trust Bloomberg Infl Snstv Eq ETF | |||
ZVOL | 11.84 | -0.11 | -0.90% |
1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGLC has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGLC jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SGLC | 100% | -0.42% | ||
BX - SGLC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
MS - SGLC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
EVR - SGLC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
AXP - SGLC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
MU - SGLC | 70% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
More |