| EWG | GF | EWG / GF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.701 | 1.147 | 497% |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 203M | 838% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 121.00 | 2% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 2.29 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 37 years | - |
| EWG | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and LEG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and LEG's prices will move in lockstep.