| EWG | GF | EWG / GF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.293 | 1.058 | 217% |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 208M | 813% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.10 | 45% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 121.00 | 2% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 2.20 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 37 years | - |
| EWG | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GF and BNR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GF and BNR's prices will move in lockstep.