Investors seeking targeted Asia-Pacific equity exposure often evaluate single-country funds against regional alternatives. The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and the iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) represent distinct approaches within developed Asian markets. EWY delivers concentrated access to South Korean large- and mid-cap companies, while IPAC provides broader coverage of developed Pacific economies. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative strategies for investors balancing country-specific opportunities against diversified regional exposure. The comparison highlights differences in cost, concentration, and risk that influence portfolio construction decisions in the current environment of shifting global trade dynamics and technology sector momentum.
The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) seeks to track the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index (Net). It employs a passive strategy and holds approximately 80 securities. Top holdings typically include SK Hynix Inc., Samsung Electronics Ltd., and SK Square Ltd., with information technology comprising over 50% of the portfolio. Other notable sectors include industrials at roughly 19% and financials near 9%. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. Launched in 2000, the fund offers annual distributions and physical replication of the underlying index. Its concentrated structure amplifies exposure to South Korea’s export-driven technology and industrial sectors, distinguishing it as a single-country vehicle with elevated volatility potential relative to broader regional peers.
The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) tracks the MSCI Pacific IMI Index (Net), encompassing large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, and Singapore. This passive ETF holds approximately 1,371 securities, providing wide diversification. Representative top holdings feature Tokyo Electron Ltd., Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., and BHP Group Ltd. Sector weights include financials around 22%, industrials near 20%, and information technology at 15%. The expense ratio is 0.09%, with semi-annual distributions. Launched in 2014, the fund uses physical replication and emphasizes low-cost access to developed Pacific markets. Its broad holdings and geographic spread differentiate it as a core regional building block rather than a concentrated thematic play.
The Pacific region encompasses technology supply chains, financial services, and resource sectors that respond to global growth trends, interest-rate cycles, and trade policies. South Korea’s economy remains tied to semiconductor and automotive exports, creating sensitivity to electronics demand and geopolitical tensions. Broader Pacific markets benefit from diversified economic drivers across Japan’s corporate reforms, Australia’s commodity cycles, and regional financial stability. Regulatory developments in technology and cross-border investment continue to influence capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation moderation and monetary policy shifts affect equity valuations across both concentrated and diversified exposures, supporting ongoing investor interest in Pacific equities for long-term portfolio diversification.
In recent market cycles, the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has exhibited greater sensitivity to technology earnings and export fluctuations, leading to sharper movements during sector rotations. The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has demonstrated more measured responses due to its multi-country and multi-sector composition, tempering volatility from any single economy. Relative positioning reflects EWY’s alignment with semiconductor and industrial momentum versus IPAC’s balanced capture of financials, materials, and broader technology trends. Over recent weeks and months, both have navigated earnings seasons and macroeconomic shifts, with IPAC’s lower expense ratio and wider diversification providing structural advantages in risk-adjusted outcomes across varied market environments.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to streamline your research process.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor the iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) due to its substantially lower expense ratio, significantly broader diversification across holdings and geographies, and more balanced sector exposure. These structural characteristics support improved risk-adjusted positioning and cost efficiency over extended periods, particularly when compared to the concentrated single-country profile of the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Probabilistic analysis of observable factors such as holdings count, sector breadth, and fee structure points to IPAC as the more resilient choice in prevailing market conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| EWY | IPAC | EWY / IPAC | |
| Gain YTD | 87.348 | 18.048 | 484% |
| Net Assets | 27.5B | 2.77B | 993% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.09 | 656% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 5.00 | 980% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 3.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| EWY | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HELS | 24.37 | 0.22 | +0.91% |
| Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | |||
| IAI | 195.35 | 0.39 | +0.20% |
| iShares US Broker-Dealers&Secs Exchs ETF | |||
| QTPI | 25.47 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| North Square Rcim Tax-Advantaged Preferred And Income Securities ETF | |||
| RSJN | 38.26 | -0.05 | -0.14% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Eq Wght Buffr ETF - Jun | |||
| RSPD | 56.31 | -1.11 | -1.93% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Cnsm Disc ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAC has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAC jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAC | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| MFG - IPAC | 70% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| ING - IPAC | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| BHP - IPAC | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| RIO - IPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| EMR - IPAC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||