EWY
Price
$182.14
Change
+$2.96 (+1.65%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Net Assets
27.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IPAC
Price
$85.50
Change
+$0.20 (+0.23%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Net Assets
2.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWY vs IPAC

EWY vs IPAC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) vs. iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC)

Key Takeaways

  • EWY provides concentrated exposure to South Korean equities with heavy weighting in information technology, while IPAC offers broad diversification across developed Pacific markets including Japan, Australia, and others.
  • IPAC maintains significantly lower costs with an expense ratio of 0.09% compared to EWY’s 0.59%, enhancing long-term net returns for cost-conscious investors.
  • EWY tracks the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index with approximately 80 holdings, resulting in higher sector concentration and volatility, whereas IPAC follows the MSCI Pacific IMI Index with over 1,300 holdings for greater diversification.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies from iShares (BlackRock), but EWY targets single-country risk while IPAC captures multi-country Pacific developed-market exposure.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: EWY emphasizes technology and industrials, whereas IPAC balances financials, industrials, and information technology more evenly.
  • IPAC’s broader geographic and holdings profile generally supports more stable positioning across market cycles compared to EWY’s focused South Korea theme.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted Asia-Pacific equity exposure often evaluate single-country funds against regional alternatives. The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and the iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) represent distinct approaches within developed Asian markets. EWY delivers concentrated access to South Korean large- and mid-cap companies, while IPAC provides broader coverage of developed Pacific economies. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative strategies for investors balancing country-specific opportunities against diversified regional exposure. The comparison highlights differences in cost, concentration, and risk that influence portfolio construction decisions in the current environment of shifting global trade dynamics and technology sector momentum.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) Overview

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) seeks to track the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index (Net). It employs a passive strategy and holds approximately 80 securities. Top holdings typically include SK Hynix Inc., Samsung Electronics Ltd., and SK Square Ltd., with information technology comprising over 50% of the portfolio. Other notable sectors include industrials at roughly 19% and financials near 9%. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. Launched in 2000, the fund offers annual distributions and physical replication of the underlying index. Its concentrated structure amplifies exposure to South Korea’s export-driven technology and industrial sectors, distinguishing it as a single-country vehicle with elevated volatility potential relative to broader regional peers.

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) tracks the MSCI Pacific IMI Index (Net), encompassing large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, and Singapore. This passive ETF holds approximately 1,371 securities, providing wide diversification. Representative top holdings feature Tokyo Electron Ltd., Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., and BHP Group Ltd. Sector weights include financials around 22%, industrials near 20%, and information technology at 15%. The expense ratio is 0.09%, with semi-annual distributions. Launched in 2014, the fund uses physical replication and emphasizes low-cost access to developed Pacific markets. Its broad holdings and geographic spread differentiate it as a core regional building block rather than a concentrated thematic play.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Pacific region encompasses technology supply chains, financial services, and resource sectors that respond to global growth trends, interest-rate cycles, and trade policies. South Korea’s economy remains tied to semiconductor and automotive exports, creating sensitivity to electronics demand and geopolitical tensions. Broader Pacific markets benefit from diversified economic drivers across Japan’s corporate reforms, Australia’s commodity cycles, and regional financial stability. Regulatory developments in technology and cross-border investment continue to influence capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation moderation and monetary policy shifts affect equity valuations across both concentrated and diversified exposures, supporting ongoing investor interest in Pacific equities for long-term portfolio diversification.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has exhibited greater sensitivity to technology earnings and export fluctuations, leading to sharper movements during sector rotations. The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has demonstrated more measured responses due to its multi-country and multi-sector composition, tempering volatility from any single economy. Relative positioning reflects EWY’s alignment with semiconductor and industrial momentum versus IPAC’s balanced capture of financials, materials, and broader technology trends. Over recent weeks and months, both have navigated earnings seasons and macroeconomic shifts, with IPAC’s lower expense ratio and wider diversification providing structural advantages in risk-adjusted outcomes across varied market environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to streamline your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor the iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) due to its substantially lower expense ratio, significantly broader diversification across holdings and geographies, and more balanced sector exposure. These structural characteristics support improved risk-adjusted positioning and cost efficiency over extended periods, particularly when compared to the concentrated single-country profile of the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Probabilistic analysis of observable factors such as holdings count, sector breadth, and fee structure points to IPAC as the more resilient choice in prevailing market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWY vs. IPAC commentary
Aug 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWY is a Buy and IPAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 27.5B vs. IPAC (2.77B). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAC: EWY (87.348) vs IPAC (18.048). EWY was incepted earlier than IPAC: EWY (26 years) vs IPAC (12 years). IPAC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than EWY (0.59). EWY has a higher turnover IPAC (5.00) vs IPAC (5.00).
EWYIPACEWY / IPAC
Gain YTD87.34818.048484%
Net Assets27.5B2.77B993%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.09656%
Turnover49.005.00980%
Yield1.253.8732%
Fund Existence26 years12 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWYIPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IPAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HELS24.370.22
+0.91%
Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF
IAI195.350.39
+0.20%
iShares US Broker-Dealers&Secs Exchs ETF
QTPI25.47-0.02
-0.08%
North Square Rcim Tax-Advantaged Preferred And Income Securities ETF
RSJN38.26-0.05
-0.14%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Eq Wght Buffr ETF - Jun
RSPD56.31-1.11
-1.93%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Cnsm Disc ETF

IPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAC has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAC jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPAC
1D Price
Change %
IPAC100%
+0.23%
MFG - IPAC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
ING - IPAC
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
BHP - IPAC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
RIO - IPAC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
EMR - IPAC
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More