EXE
Price
$95.88
Change
-$0.82 (-0.85%)
Updated
May 12, 01:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.12B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RRC
Price
$40.82
Change
-$0.15 (-0.37%)
Updated
May 12, 01:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.65B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXE vs RRC

Header iconEXE vs RRC Comparison
Open Charts EXE vs RRCBanner chart's image
EXE vs RRC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) vs. Range Resources Corporation (RRC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both EXE and RRC are independent natural gas producers focused on U.S. shale plays, offering exposure to the energy sector amid volatile commodity prices.
  • RRC shows stronger year-to-date performance at +20.42% compared to EXE's +12.14%.
  • RRC recently reported a Q1 earnings beat with revenue up over 26% year-over-year, boosting recent momentum.
  • EXE trades at a larger market cap of $23.2 billion versus RRC's $10 billion, with similar forward P/E ratios around 12.
  • Analyst price targets suggest upside for both, with EXE at $132 and RRC at $47.
  • Recent price action shows stability for both stocks in the mid-$90s for EXE and low-$40s for RRC.

Introduction

In the dynamic energy sector, EXE and RRC stand out as key natural gas producers navigating fluctuating prices and demand shifts. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent market performance, and relative positioning, aiding traders seeking short-term opportunities and investors eyeing long-term energy exposure. With natural gas prices influenced by weather, exports, and global events, understanding how these stocks respond to sector trends helps in portfolio allocation and relative value trades. Both companies operate in prolific U.S. basins, making them benchmarks for Appalachian and shale gas sentiment.

EXE Overview and Recent Performance

Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is an independent exploration and production (E&P) company focused on natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) from the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania, Utica Shale in Ohio and West Virginia, and Haynesville Shale in Louisiana and Texas. Formerly Chesapeake Energy, it rebranded in October 2024. In recent market activity, the stock has traded stably around the mid-$90s to low-$100s, recovering from a dip to $94.26 amid broader energy sector pressures. Year-to-date gains stand at 12.14%, supported by solid fundamentals like trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $11.64 billion and EPS of $7.57. Sentiment reflects anticipation for upcoming Q1 earnings, tempered by analyst price target adjustments and post-rebrand valuation scrutiny, contributing to range-bound trading.

RRC Overview and Recent Performance

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) operates as an independent natural gas, NGLs, and oil producer primarily in the Appalachian Basin, selling to utilities, midstream firms, and industrial users. Recent weeks have seen positive momentum following a strong Q1 report on April 21, with revenue surging 26% year-over-year to $1.07 billion and record cash flow, surpassing estimates. The stock, priced around $42, fluctuated between $40 and $43 in recent sessions, reflecting a partial recovery post-earnings dip. Year-to-date returns of 20.42% outpace peers, driven by higher price realizations and operational efficiency, though commodity volatility remains a key influencer on sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, scalping (short-term trades), and pattern recognition, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout performers include a 60-minute AI/ML bot on energy and tech tickers achieving +167% annualized returns and 74% win rates, alongside others posting 93-127% annualized gains and profit factors above 2.0. Selected for current market conditions, they highlight bots with low drawdowns and high consistency. Traders can explore these for copy trading insights tailored to volatile sectors like energy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

EXE and RRC share upstream E&P models in natural gas-heavy portfolios but differ in scale and geography: EXE’s diversified shales provide broader exposure, while RRC concentrates on Appalachia for cost advantages. Growth drivers favor RRC’s recent revenue surge versus EXE’s steady production. Momentum tilts to RRC with superior YTD gains and earnings catalysts, though EXE offers higher absolute upside per analyst targets. Risk factors include natural gas price sensitivity for both, with EXE facing rebrand integration and RRC potential post-earnings consolidation. Market sentiment leans positive on RRC’s execution amid sector recovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor RRC in the current environment due to its trend consistency from the Q1 earnings beat, stronger relative YTD performance, and positive cash flow positioning. While EXE maintains stability and higher analyst upside, RRC exhibits better near-term catalysts and momentum signals, suggesting a probabilistic edge for traders monitoring energy flows.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EXE vs. RRC commentary
May 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXE is a Hold and RRC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2026
Stock price -- (EXE: $96.66 vs. RRC: $40.97)
Brand notoriety: EXE and RRC are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXE: 56% vs. RRC: 61%
Market capitalization -- EXE: $23.12B vs. RRC: $9.65B
EXE [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $23.12B. RRC’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $9.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $140.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $5.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EXE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RRC is a better buy in the long-term than EXE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RRC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXE is a better buy in the short-term than RRC.

Price Growth

EXE (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.08% price change this week, while RRC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXE is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

RRC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-3.36% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EXE($23.1B) has a higher market cap than RRC($9.65B). RRC has higher P/E ratio than EXE: RRC (10.84) vs EXE (7.19). RRC YTD gains are higher at: 16.466 vs. EXE (-11.936). EXE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.31B vs. RRC (1.62B). EXE has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. RRC (247K). RRC has less debt than EXE: RRC (979M) vs EXE (5.06B). EXE has higher revenues than RRC: EXE (14.4B) vs RRC (3.21B).
EXERRCEXE / RRC
Capitalization23.1B9.65B239%
EBITDA7.31B1.62B451%
Gain YTD-11.93616.466-72%
P/E Ratio7.1910.8466%
Revenue14.4B3.21B449%
Total Cash2.22B247K898,785%
Total Debt5.06B979M517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXE vs RRC: Fundamental Ratings
EXE
RRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
763
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3319
SMR RATING
1..100
4944
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RRC's Valuation (73) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EXE (94). This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to EXE’s over the last 12 months.

RRC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EXE (33). This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to EXE’s over the last 12 months.

RRC's SMR Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EXE (49). This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to EXE’s over the last 12 months.

RRC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EXE (78). This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to EXE’s over the last 12 months.

RRC's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EXE (99). This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to EXE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXERRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RRC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROBN21.561.92
+9.78%
T-Rex 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF
LIAE209.290.63
+0.30%
LifeX 2050 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF
GAA35.300.09
+0.25%
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
AAAU46.690.10
+0.20%
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
VKI9.03-0.01
-0.11%
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II

EXE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXE has been closely correlated with EQT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXE jumps, then EQT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXE
1D Price
Change %
EXE100%
+0.75%
EQT - EXE
82%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
RRC - EXE
76%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
AR - EXE
76%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
GPOR - EXE
75%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
CRK - EXE
68%
Closely correlated
+6.88%
More

RRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRC has been closely correlated with AR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRC jumps, then AR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRC
1D Price
Change %
RRC100%
+1.11%
AR - RRC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
EQT - RRC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
GPOR - RRC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
EXE - RRC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
CRK - RRC
68%
Closely correlated
+6.88%
More