Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FADCX vs RERCX
FADCX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FADCX vs RERCX
FADCX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FADCX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FADCX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FADCX (1.81B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FADCX: RERCX (2.37) vs FADCX (0.70). FADCX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FADCX (28 years) vs RERCX (24 years). FADCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FADCX (46.00). FADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FADCX (0) vs RERCX (250). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. FADCX (11.30). FADCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.86 vs. RERCX (-3.91).
| FADCX | RERCX | FADCX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.12 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.12 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.009 | 6.672 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 2.37 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 13.33 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.19 | 25.06 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.86 | -3.91 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.96 | 58.14 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement