FANG
Price
$138.71
Change
-$4.03 (-2.82%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
40.15B
65 days until earnings call
WDS
Price
$16.65
Change
-$0.08 (-0.48%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.91B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs WDS

Header iconFANG vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs WDSBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$138.71
Change-$4.03 (-2.82%)
Volume$2M
Capitalization40.15B
Woodside Energy Group
Price$16.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.48%)
Volume$678.41K
Capitalization31.91B
FANG vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. WDS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and WDS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $138.71 vs. WDS: $16.65)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. WDS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 109% vs. WDS: 108%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $40.15B vs. WDS: $31.91B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $40.15B. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $31.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than WDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.76% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

WDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($40.2B) has a higher market cap than WDS($31.9B). WDS has higher P/E ratio than FANG: WDS (10.79) vs FANG (10.05). WDS YTD gains are higher at: 14.038 vs. FANG (-13.525). FANG (9.71B) and WDS (9.55B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . WDS has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. FANG (219M). WDS has less debt than FANG: WDS (11.6B) vs FANG (15.1B). FANG (14B) and WDS (13.8B) have equivalent revenues.
FANGWDSFANG / WDS
Capitalization40.2B31.9B126%
EBITDA9.71B9.55B102%
Gain YTD-13.52514.038-96%
P/E Ratio10.0510.7993%
Revenue14B13.8B101%
Total Cash219M1.6B14%
Total Debt15.1B11.6B130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
465
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3860
SMR RATING
1..100
5794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (61) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (60) in the null industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (94) in the null industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FANG (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDS (90) in the null industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWML22.010.57
+2.68%
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Fctr TR ETN
JPRE48.100.44
+0.92%
JPMorgan Realty Income ETF
MHNC17.900.14
+0.79%
MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd
USMC65.46-0.32
-0.49%
Principal US Mega-Cap ETF
FTXN28.04-0.62
-2.15%
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-2.82%
MTDR - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
PR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
OVV - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
CHRD - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-3.78%
DVN - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
More