FANH
Price
$1.25
Change
+$0.01 (+0.81%)
Updated
Sep 16, 03:10 PM (EDT)
2 days until earnings call
WTW
Price
$292.53
Change
+$1.83 (+0.63%)
Updated
Sep 16, 09:51 AM (EDT)
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FANH vs WTW

Header iconFANH vs WTW Comparison
Open Charts FANH vs WTWBanner chart's image
Fanhua
Price$1.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.81%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Willis Towers Watson Public
Price$292.53
Change+$1.83 (+0.63%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FANH vs WTW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FANH vs. WTW commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANH is a Sell and WTW is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (FANH: $1.24 vs. WTW: $290.70)
Brand notoriety: FANH and WTW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANH: 31% vs. WTW: 125%
Market capitalization -- FANH: $269.5M vs. WTW: $28.02B
FANH [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. WTW’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $28.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FANH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTW is a better buy in the long-term than FANH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WTW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANH is a better buy in the short-term than WTW.

Price Growth

FANH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANH is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

WTW is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (+0.02% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTW($28B) has a higher market cap than FANH($270M). WTW has higher P/E ratio than FANH: WTW (27.48) vs FANH (4.96). WTW YTD gains are higher at: 21.315 vs. FANH (-81.353). WTW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. FANH (424M). FANH has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. WTW (1.42B). FANH has less debt than WTW: FANH (304M) vs WTW (5.94B). WTW has higher revenues than FANH: WTW (9.48B) vs FANH (3.36B).
FANHWTWFANH / WTW
Capitalization270M28B1%
EBITDA424M2.02B21%
Gain YTD-81.35321.315-382%
P/E Ratio4.9627.4818%
Revenue3.36B9.48B35%
Total Cash1.5B1.42B105%
Total Debt304M5.94B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANH vs WTW: Fundamental Ratings
FANH
WTW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
543
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
5765
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9520
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANH's Valuation (36) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANH (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than FANH’s over the last 12 months.

FANH's SMR Rating (57) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as WTW (65) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FANH’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANH (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than FANH’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANH (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than FANH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANHWTW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXFY2.520.18
+7.69%
Expensify
TMP57.701.89
+3.39%
Tompkins Financial Corp
FOXA39.660.75
+1.93%
Fox Corp
ICFI167.832.48
+1.50%
ICF International
NVOS0.30N/A
-0.07%
Novo Integrated Sciences

FANH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANH and BRO have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANH and BRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANH
1D Price
Change %
FANH100%
+2.48%
BRO - FANH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
EHTH - FANH
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
SLQT - FANH
21%
Poorly correlated
-43.73%
HUIZ - FANH
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
WTW - FANH
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

WTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been loosely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTW
1D Price
Change %
WTW100%
+0.37%
AJG - WTW
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MMC - WTW
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
BRO - WTW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
AON - WTW
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
ERIE - WTW
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
More