Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$18.96
Change-$0.45 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.85
Change-$1.72 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.02B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FAOFX (1.04B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.56) vs FAOFX (0.36). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. RGAGX (4.94). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 33.21 vs. FAOFX (-0.96).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.281 | 13.816 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.56 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 4.94 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.82 | 62.65 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.96 | 33.21 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.15 | 88.35 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement