Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$16.27
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets865.53M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$76.09
Change+$0.28 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.16B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 297B vs. FAOFX (866M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.70) vs FAOFX (0.48). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. RGAGX (6.73). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.46 vs. FAOFX (16.22).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.994 | 2.066 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 866M | 297B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.70 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 6.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.61 | 40.75 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.22 | 49.46 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.56 | 69.20 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement