Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$18.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets990.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$82.45
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.87B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 321B vs. FAOFX (990M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.61) vs FAOFX (0.40). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. RGAGX (9.68). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. FAOFX (9.86).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.547 | 10.597 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 990M | 321B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.61 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 9.68 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.88 | 55.35 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.86 | 46.45 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.66 | 87.34 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement