Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$19.21
Change+$0.15 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets992.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.68
Change+$0.59 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FAOFX (993M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.60) vs FAOFX (0.38). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. RGAGX (14.61). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.36 vs. FAOFX (3.31).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.166 | 14.930 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.60 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.96 | 14.61 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.06 | 53.65 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.31 | 39.36 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.02 | 99.26 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement