Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$20.23
Change+$0.22 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.59
Change+$0.67 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. FAOFX (1.02B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.58) vs FAOFX (0.37). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.76 vs. RGAGX (15.21). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.18 vs. FAOFX (5.38).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.906 | 20.174 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.76 | 15.21 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 125.41 | 77.47 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.38 | 44.18 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.00 | 108.40 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement