Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPLX vs RGEBX
FAPLX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FAPLX vs RGEBX
FAPLX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FAPLX (15.1M). FAPLX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FAPLX (0.38) vs RGEBX (0.00). FAPLX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FAPLX (4 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). FAPLX (2.35) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). FAPLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FAPLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FAPLX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FAPLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. RGEBX (3.42).
| FAPLX | RGEBX | FAPLX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.08 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.08 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.257 | 6.888 | 62% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | 3.42 | 382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.59 | 36.26 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 12.32 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers