Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASEX vs JVMCX
FASEX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FASEX vs JVMCX
FASEX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASEX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASEX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. FASEX (373M). FASEX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FASEX (0.92) vs JVMCX (0.00). FASEX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FASEX (39 years) vs JVMCX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FASEX (1.20). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FASEX (19.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASEX: JVMCX (1000) vs FASEX (2500). FASEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. JVMCX (6.33). FASEX return over 5 years is better than : 24.60 vs. JVMCX (4.62).
| FASEX | JVMCX | FASEX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.85 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.86 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.735 | 8.366 | 236% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 22.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.35 | 6.33 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.77 | 16.34 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 4.62 | 533% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.67 | 48.50 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement