Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASEX vs MVCAX
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASEX vs MVCAX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities A
Price$57.12
Change-$0.19 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets333.46M
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASEX vs. MVCAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASEX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. FASEX (333M). FASEX (0.86) and MVCAX (0.85) have matching dividends . FASEX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASEX (38 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FASEX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FASEX (20.00). FASEX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASEX: MVCAX (1000) vs FASEX (2500). FASEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.99 vs. MVCAX (-10.73). FASEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. MVCAX (32.26).
| FASEX | MVCAX | FASEX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.524 | 1.597 | 346% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 16.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.85 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.99 | -10.73 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.83 | 9.47 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.19 | 32.26 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.22 | 65.95 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement