Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASEX vs MVCAX
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASEX vs MVCAX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities A
Price$58.31
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.75M
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASEX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASEX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. FASEX (381M). FASEX (0.90) and MVCAX (0.86) have matching dividends . FASEX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASEX (38 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FASEX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FASEX (20.00). FASEX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASEX: MVCAX (1000) vs FASEX (2500). FASEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. MVCAX (-4.16). FASEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.67 vs. MVCAX (50.10).
| FASEX | MVCAX | FASEX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.813 | 5.085 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 381M | 17.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.86 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | -4.16 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.16 | 14.01 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.67 | 50.10 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.02 | 74.07 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers