Ad is loading...
FASEX vs MVCAX
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASEX vs MVCAX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value 1 A
Price$49.60
Change+$0.39 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.36M
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASEX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASEX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. FASEX (362M). FASEX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: FASEX (0.96) vs MVCAX (0.90). FASEX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASEX (37 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FASEX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FASEX (20.00). FASEX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASEX: MVCAX (1000) vs FASEX (2500). FASEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.31 vs. MVCAX (-9.60). FASEX return over 5 years is better than : 65.11 vs. MVCAX (57.60).
| FASEX | MVCAX | FASEX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.391 | -9.094 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 15.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.31 | -9.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.87 | -4.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.11 | 57.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.48 | 42.94 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers