Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASEX vs MVCAX
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASEX vs MVCAX
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASEX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASEX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. FASEX (373M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FASEX: MVCAX (1.16) vs FASEX (0.92). FASEX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASEX (39 years) vs MVCAX (25 years). FASEX (1.20) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (0.98). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FASEX (19.00). FASEX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASEX: MVCAX (1000) vs FASEX (2500). FASEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. MVCAX (11.29). FASEX return over 5 years is better than : 24.60 vs. MVCAX (14.75).
| FASEX | MVCAX | FASEX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.97 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.98 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.735 | 10.210 | 193% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 17B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.16 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.35 | 11.29 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.77 | 23.67 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 14.75 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.67 | 87.51 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers