Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBEX
FASMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBEX
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%
Price$22.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.93
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
FASMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a StrongBuy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. FASMX (9.76B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FASMX (2.25) vs RLBEX (1.79). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FASMX (37 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.55). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FASMX (12.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FASMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. FASMX (9.38). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. FASMX (26.40).
| FASMX | RLBEX | FASMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.59 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.59 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.321 | 11.352 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 258B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 1.79 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 9.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.56 | 39.85 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.40 | 39.68 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.54 | 77.45 | 72% |