FATE
Price
$1.39
Change
-$0.24 (-14.72%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
160.31M
16 days until earnings call
HOWL
Price
$1.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
74.54M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATE vs HOWL

Header iconFATE vs HOWL Comparison
Open Charts FATE vs HOWLBanner chart's image
Fate Therapeutics
Price$1.39
Change-$0.24 (-14.72%)
Volume$2.34M
Capitalization160.31M
Werewolf Therapeutics
Price$1.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$905.94K
Capitalization74.54M
FATE vs HOWL Comparison Chart in %
FATE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATE vs. HOWL commentary
Oct 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATE is a StrongBuy and HOWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FATE: $1.39 vs. HOWL: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: FATE and HOWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATE: 106% vs. HOWL: 113%
Market capitalization -- FATE: $160.31M vs. HOWL: $74.54M
FATE [@Biotechnology] is valued at $160.31M. HOWL’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $74.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $104.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATE and HOWL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FATE is a better buy in the short-term than HOWL.

Price Growth

FATE (@Biotechnology) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while HOWL (@Biotechnology) price change was -19.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FATE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HOWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+1.18% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FATE($160M) has a higher market cap than HOWL($74.5M). HOWL YTD gains are higher at: 10.135 vs. FATE (-15.758). HOWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -66.34M vs. FATE (-161.6M). FATE has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. HOWL (77.6M). HOWL has less debt than FATE: HOWL (37.1M) vs FATE (81.3M). FATE has higher revenues than HOWL: FATE (8.47M) vs HOWL (0).
FATEHOWLFATE / HOWL
Capitalization160M74.5M215%
EBITDA-161.6M-66.34M244%
Gain YTD-15.75810.135-155%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue8.47M0-
Total Cash223M77.6M287%
Total Debt81.3M37.1M219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FATE: Fundamental Ratings
FATE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATEHOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GNRV3.900.08
+2.09%
Grand River Commerce Inc.
GYUAF23.26N/A
N/A
Gs Yuasa Corp.
NFPC17.02N/A
N/A
Northfield Precision Instrument Corp.
CRAWA75.50-0.75
-0.98%
Crawford United Corporation
CHEOF182.91-3.99
-2.14%
CochLear Ltd.

FATE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FATE has been loosely correlated with CRBU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FATE jumps, then CRBU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATE
1D Price
Change %
FATE100%
-14.98%
CRBU - FATE
52%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
RXRX - FATE
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.95%
IPSC - FATE
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
ALLO - FATE
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
NKTX - FATE
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.63%
More

HOWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOWL has been loosely correlated with CLDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOWL jumps, then CLDX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOWL
1D Price
Change %
HOWL100%
N/A
CLDX - HOWL
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
GNPX - HOWL
39%
Loosely correlated
-5.44%
BCRX - HOWL
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
OCUL - HOWL
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
ATNM - HOWL
37%
Loosely correlated
+8.05%
More