Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCIX vs HDAVX
FBCIX vs HDAVX Comparison
Open Charts FBCIX vs HDAVX
FBCIX vs HDAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCIX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. HDAVX (317M). FBCIX pays higher dividends than HDAVX: FBCIX (2.93) vs HDAVX (1.61). FBCIX was incepted earlier than HDAVX: FBCIX (6 years) vs HDAVX (14 years). HDAVX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FBCIX (0.35). FBCIX (50.00) and HDAVX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDAVX: FBCIX (250) vs HDAVX (2500). HDAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.87 vs. FBCIX (12.74). HDAVX return over 5 years is better than : 63.24 vs. FBCIX (42.64).
| FBCIX | HDAVX | FBCIX / HDAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.10 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.600 | 16.989 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 317M | 40,379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.61 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 22.87 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 59.42 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.64 | 63.24 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement