Advertisement
FBDC vs HTGC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBDC is a Hold and HTGC is a Hold.
HTGC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FBDC | HTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 71% | 10 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QDTY | 38.78 | 0.40 | +1.04% |
| YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Cove CllStgyETF | |||
| AOR | 69.36 | 0.36 | +0.52% |
| iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF | |||
| SMCF | 39.61 | 0.14 | +0.37% |
| Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF | |||
| VBND | 42.46 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | |||
| MHF | 6.53 | -0.04 | -0.61% |
| Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund | |||
FBDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBDC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBDC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBDC | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| OBDC - FBDC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BXSL - FBDC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MAIN - FBDC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| TSLX - FBDC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| HTGC - FBDC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
HTGC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTGC | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| ARCC - HTGC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| TSLX - HTGC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| OBDC - HTGC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MAIN - HTGC | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| PFLT - HTGC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||