FBIZ
Price
$70.21
Change
+$2.95 (+4.39%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
587.11M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRST
Price
$16.02
Change
+$0.12 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
398.56M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBIZ vs FRST

FBIZ vs FRST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? First Business Financial Services (FBIZ) vs. Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FBIZ has demonstrated 20 years of compound annual EPS (earnings per share) growth of approximately 10%, supported by a disciplined commercial lending model and a growing private wealth management platform.
  • FRST is in the midst of a profitability turnaround, with net interest margin expanding from 2.86% to 3.45% year-over-year and earnings nearly quadrupling in the most recent quarter.
  • Both companies are regional bank holding companies, but FBIZ operates with a more focused commercial banking approach while FRST pursues a diversified strategy spanning mortgage, warehouse lending, and specialized healthcare professional banking.
  • FBIZ offers a substantially higher dividend yield (approximately 2%) backed by 14 consecutive years of increases, compared to FRST's steady but modest $0.10 quarterly payout.
  • Asset quality remains a point of divergence: FRST has been working through elevated nonperforming assets tied to office commercial real estate, while FBIZ has maintained relatively stable credit metrics.
  • Both stocks have posted strong year-over-year gains, yet their risk profiles and growth trajectories cater to different investor preferences.

Introduction

Investors scanning the U.S. regional banking landscape frequently encounter two names that, despite operating in the same broad sector, represent markedly different value propositions: FBIZ (First Business Financial Services, Inc.) and FRST (Primis Financial Corp.). Both are publicly traded bank holding companies with headquarters in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions, respectively, and both have delivered notable shareholder returns over the trailing twelve months. Yet beneath the surface, these institutions diverge in strategy, earnings consistency, balance sheet composition, and growth catalysts. This comparison is designed for traders and investors evaluating regional bank exposure, dividend reliability, turnaround potential, and how AI-driven analytics might assess the relative positioning of each stock in the current market environment.

FBIZ Overview and Recent Performance

First Business Financial Services, Inc., headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin, operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, First Business Bank. The company specializes in commercial banking products — including commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate lending, SBA (Small Business Administration) lending and servicing, asset-based lending, equipment financing, and treasury management — primarily serving small to medium-sized businesses, executives, and high-net-worth individuals. A distinguishing feature is its private wealth management division, which has grown assets under management and administration to approximately $3.8 billion, generating a growing stream of fee-based income that accounted for roughly 45% of non-interest income in recent quarters.

In recent market activity, FBIZ has traded near the upper end of its 52-week range, reflecting sustained investor confidence. For the full year 2025, the company reported net income available to common shareholders of $49.4 million, or $5.94 per diluted share, supported by double-digit loan and core deposit growth. The net interest margin (NIM) — a key measure of lending profitability — held firm in the 3.53% to 3.68% range across recent quarters, a testament to disciplined match-funding strategies. Notably, the company raised its quarterly cash dividend by 17% to $0.34 per share, marking its 14th consecutive annual increase. Tangible book value per share expanded at a mid-teens annualized rate, underscoring healthy capital accumulation. While a single-client relationship caused a temporary uptick in nonperforming loans in late 2025, management characterized the broader credit portfolio as stable.

FRST Overview and Recent Performance

Primis Financial Corp., headquartered in McLean, Virginia, operates Primis Bank with 24 full-service branches across Virginia and Maryland. The company has deliberately diversified beyond traditional community banking, building out Primis Mortgage (residential and construction-to-permanent lending), a mortgage warehouse lending division, and Panacea Financial — a specialized banking platform serving healthcare professionals. This multi-segment approach has created multiple avenues for revenue growth, though it has also introduced variability in quarterly earnings.

Recent quarters have shown a marked improvement in FRST's financial trajectory. In the second quarter of 2026, the company reported net income of $9.4 million, or $0.38 per diluted share — nearly four times the $2.4 million reported in the same period a year earlier. Net interest margin expanded sharply to 3.45%, up from 2.86% in the prior-year quarter, driven by earning-asset growth and declining deposit costs. The mortgage warehouse business surged, with balances nearly tripling year-over-year, while Panacea Financial grew deposits by over 50% and loans by 22%. Nonperforming assets declined 37% during the quarter, and the company announced a core consolidation initiative expected to produce approximately $7 million in annual pretax earnings enhancements beginning in 2027. Tangible book value per share rose 19.5% year-over-year to $13.72. Still, the quarter included a $5.3 million reserve build on a single office commercial real estate credit, highlighting lingering asset-quality considerations.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI trading bots. With hundreds of bots trading thousands of different tickers across varying timeframes and strategies, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These AI robots — powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) — employ diverse trading styles, from swing trading and trend following to high-frequency intraday strategies, with annualized returns among top performers recently ranging from approximately 34% to over 170%, and win rates reaching as high as 90% in certain sectors. Each bot manages its own portfolio of tickers, risk parameters, and timeframe preferences, giving users flexibility to match their individual trading objectives. Explore the full Trending AI Robots lineup to see which strategies are currently capturing market opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between FBIZ and FRST becomes clearest when examining business models and risk profiles side by side. FBIZ adheres to a focused commercial banking model, generating the bulk of its revenue through net interest income supplemented by a steadily growing private wealth franchise. Its efficiency ratio has trended below 60%, indicating strong operating leverage, and its 20-year track record of double-digit compound EPS growth reflects consistency prized by long-term investors. The bank's asset base is concentrated in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate in the upper Midwest, a region with relatively stable economic fundamentals.

FRST, by contrast, has pursued deliberate diversification across mortgage origination, warehouse lending, and niche professional banking — segments that offer higher growth potential but also introduce cyclical sensitivity. Mortgage banking revenues, for example, are influenced by interest rate movements and housing market dynamics. The company's total asset base, at over $4.3 billion, exceeds that of FBIZ, yet its market capitalization is smaller, reflecting the market's discount for earnings volatility and credit uncertainty. On the other hand, FRST's margin expansion story is compelling: a 59-basis-point improvement in NIM over the past year signals that management's balance sheet repositioning is bearing fruit. The core consolidation plan and deployment of AI tools for productivity improvement also suggest a forward-leaning operational posture.

From a dividend perspective, FBIZ offers a clear advantage with a higher yield and a long history of annual increases, appealing to income-oriented investors. FRST has maintained 58 consecutive quarterly dividends at $0.10 per share, a testament to commitment, though the payout represents a smaller income stream. In terms of risk, FBIZ's primary concern revolves around commercial real estate exposure and the impact of sustained higher rates on borrower credit quality, while FRST faces more acute credit challenges concentrated in office CRE and the execution risk associated with its core conversion initiative.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors analyzed through a probabilistic AI-driven lens, Tickeron's models would likely express a preference for FBIZ in the current market environment. The rationale centers on trend consistency: FBIZ's two-decade record of compounding earnings growth, stable and above-peer net interest margins, positive operating leverage, and a tangible book value that has grown reliably across multiple quarters provide the type of steady signal patterns that quantitative models favor. While FRST presents a more dynamic turnaround narrative — with accelerating margins, improving asset quality metrics, and tangible upside from the core consolidation strategy — its earnings profile remains less predictable, and the overhang of office CRE exposure introduces a level of uncertainty that typically leads AI systems to assign a wider confidence interval. An AI model weighing momentum, stability, and risk-adjusted return potential would therefore lean toward FBIZ, while acknowledging that FRST's improving trajectory could close the gap if the current pace of operational improvement is sustained over the next several quarters.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FBIZ vs. FRST commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBIZ is a StrongBuy and FRST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FBIZ: $70.21 vs. FRST: $16.02)
Brand notoriety: FBIZ and FRST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBIZ: 131% vs. FRST: 43%
Market capitalization -- FBIZ: $587.11M vs. FRST: $398.56M
FBIZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $587.11M. FRST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $398.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBIZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBIZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBIZ is a better buy in the long-term than FRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBIZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRST’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBIZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRST’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBIZ is a better buy in the short-term than FRST.

Price Growth

FBIZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.51% price change this week, while FRST (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBIZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

FRST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBIZ($587M) has a higher market cap than FRST($399M). FBIZ has higher P/E ratio than FRST: FBIZ (10.70) vs FRST (7.42). FBIZ YTD gains are higher at: 30.841 vs. FRST (16.797). FBIZ has more cash in the bank: 32.6M vs. FRST (9.69M). FBIZ has less debt than FRST: FBIZ (310M) vs FRST (375M). FBIZ has higher revenues than FRST: FBIZ (172M) vs FRST (128M).
FBIZFRSTFBIZ / FRST
Capitalization587M399M147%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.84116.797184%
P/E Ratio10.707.42144%
Revenue172M128M134%
Total Cash32.6M9.69M336%
Total Debt310M375M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBIZ vs FRST: Fundamental Ratings
FBIZ
FRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
673
SMR RATING
1..100
4959
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRST's Valuation (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBIZ (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew similarly to FBIZ’s over the last 12 months.

FBIZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRST (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FBIZ's SMR Rating (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FRST (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FBIZ's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FRST (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FBIZ's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRST (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBIZFRST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBIZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAGPX13.310.28
+2.15%
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts P
FEXRX15.260.07
+0.46%
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity R6
CBFAX42.620.19
+0.45%
American Funds Global Balanced 529-A
OIIEX17.960.05
+0.28%
Optimum International Instl
ARSTX18.300.01
+0.05%
Nuveen Small Cap Select I

FBIZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIZ has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIZ jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIZ
1D Price
Change %
FBIZ100%
+4.39%
MBWM - FBIZ
84%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
CCNE - FBIZ
84%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
SHBI - FBIZ
83%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
FMBH - FBIZ
83%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
TRMK - FBIZ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

FRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRST has been closely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRST jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRST
1D Price
Change %
FRST100%
+0.75%
FISI - FRST
70%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
HBNC - FRST
70%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
COFS - FRST
69%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
BY - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
FBIZ - FRST
68%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
More