Investors scanning the U.S. regional banking landscape frequently encounter two names that, despite operating in the same broad sector, represent markedly different value propositions: FBIZ (First Business Financial Services, Inc.) and FRST (Primis Financial Corp.). Both are publicly traded bank holding companies with headquarters in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions, respectively, and both have delivered notable shareholder returns over the trailing twelve months. Yet beneath the surface, these institutions diverge in strategy, earnings consistency, balance sheet composition, and growth catalysts. This comparison is designed for traders and investors evaluating regional bank exposure, dividend reliability, turnaround potential, and how AI-driven analytics might assess the relative positioning of each stock in the current market environment.
First Business Financial Services, Inc., headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin, operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, First Business Bank. The company specializes in commercial banking products — including commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate lending, SBA (Small Business Administration) lending and servicing, asset-based lending, equipment financing, and treasury management — primarily serving small to medium-sized businesses, executives, and high-net-worth individuals. A distinguishing feature is its private wealth management division, which has grown assets under management and administration to approximately $3.8 billion, generating a growing stream of fee-based income that accounted for roughly 45% of non-interest income in recent quarters.
In recent market activity, FBIZ has traded near the upper end of its 52-week range, reflecting sustained investor confidence. For the full year 2025, the company reported net income available to common shareholders of $49.4 million, or $5.94 per diluted share, supported by double-digit loan and core deposit growth. The net interest margin (NIM) — a key measure of lending profitability — held firm in the 3.53% to 3.68% range across recent quarters, a testament to disciplined match-funding strategies. Notably, the company raised its quarterly cash dividend by 17% to $0.34 per share, marking its 14th consecutive annual increase. Tangible book value per share expanded at a mid-teens annualized rate, underscoring healthy capital accumulation. While a single-client relationship caused a temporary uptick in nonperforming loans in late 2025, management characterized the broader credit portfolio as stable.
Primis Financial Corp., headquartered in McLean, Virginia, operates Primis Bank with 24 full-service branches across Virginia and Maryland. The company has deliberately diversified beyond traditional community banking, building out Primis Mortgage (residential and construction-to-permanent lending), a mortgage warehouse lending division, and Panacea Financial — a specialized banking platform serving healthcare professionals. This multi-segment approach has created multiple avenues for revenue growth, though it has also introduced variability in quarterly earnings.
Recent quarters have shown a marked improvement in FRST's financial trajectory. In the second quarter of 2026, the company reported net income of $9.4 million, or $0.38 per diluted share — nearly four times the $2.4 million reported in the same period a year earlier. Net interest margin expanded sharply to 3.45%, up from 2.86% in the prior-year quarter, driven by earning-asset growth and declining deposit costs. The mortgage warehouse business surged, with balances nearly tripling year-over-year, while Panacea Financial grew deposits by over 50% and loans by 22%. Nonperforming assets declined 37% during the quarter, and the company announced a core consolidation initiative expected to produce approximately $7 million in annual pretax earnings enhancements beginning in 2027. Tangible book value per share rose 19.5% year-over-year to $13.72. Still, the quarter included a $5.3 million reserve build on a single office commercial real estate credit, highlighting lingering asset-quality considerations.
For investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI trading bots. With hundreds of bots trading thousands of different tickers across varying timeframes and strategies, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These AI robots — powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) — employ diverse trading styles, from swing trading and trend following to high-frequency intraday strategies, with annualized returns among top performers recently ranging from approximately 34% to over 170%, and win rates reaching as high as 90% in certain sectors. Each bot manages its own portfolio of tickers, risk parameters, and timeframe preferences, giving users flexibility to match their individual trading objectives. Explore the full Trending AI Robots lineup to see which strategies are currently capturing market opportunities.
The contrast between FBIZ and FRST becomes clearest when examining business models and risk profiles side by side. FBIZ adheres to a focused commercial banking model, generating the bulk of its revenue through net interest income supplemented by a steadily growing private wealth franchise. Its efficiency ratio has trended below 60%, indicating strong operating leverage, and its 20-year track record of double-digit compound EPS growth reflects consistency prized by long-term investors. The bank's asset base is concentrated in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate in the upper Midwest, a region with relatively stable economic fundamentals.
FRST, by contrast, has pursued deliberate diversification across mortgage origination, warehouse lending, and niche professional banking — segments that offer higher growth potential but also introduce cyclical sensitivity. Mortgage banking revenues, for example, are influenced by interest rate movements and housing market dynamics. The company's total asset base, at over $4.3 billion, exceeds that of FBIZ, yet its market capitalization is smaller, reflecting the market's discount for earnings volatility and credit uncertainty. On the other hand, FRST's margin expansion story is compelling: a 59-basis-point improvement in NIM over the past year signals that management's balance sheet repositioning is bearing fruit. The core consolidation plan and deployment of AI tools for productivity improvement also suggest a forward-leaning operational posture.
From a dividend perspective, FBIZ offers a clear advantage with a higher yield and a long history of annual increases, appealing to income-oriented investors. FRST has maintained 58 consecutive quarterly dividends at $0.10 per share, a testament to commitment, though the payout represents a smaller income stream. In terms of risk, FBIZ's primary concern revolves around commercial real estate exposure and the impact of sustained higher rates on borrower credit quality, while FRST faces more acute credit challenges concentrated in office CRE and the execution risk associated with its core conversion initiative.
Based on observable factors analyzed through a probabilistic AI-driven lens, Tickeron's models would likely express a preference for FBIZ in the current market environment. The rationale centers on trend consistency: FBIZ's two-decade record of compounding earnings growth, stable and above-peer net interest margins, positive operating leverage, and a tangible book value that has grown reliably across multiple quarters provide the type of steady signal patterns that quantitative models favor. While FRST presents a more dynamic turnaround narrative — with accelerating margins, improving asset quality metrics, and tangible upside from the core consolidation strategy — its earnings profile remains less predictable, and the overhang of office CRE exposure introduces a level of uncertainty that typically leads AI systems to assign a wider confidence interval. An AI model weighing momentum, stability, and risk-adjusted return potential would therefore lean toward FBIZ, while acknowledging that FRST's improving trajectory could close the gap if the current pace of operational improvement is sustained over the next several quarters.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FBIZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FBIZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRST’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
FBIZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.51% price change this week, while FRST (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.
FBIZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
FRST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FBIZ | FRST | FBIZ / FRST | |
| Capitalization | 587M | 399M | 147% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.841 | 16.797 | 184% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.70 | 7.42 | 144% |
| Revenue | 172M | 128M | 134% |
| Total Cash | 32.6M | 9.69M | 336% |
| Total Debt | 310M | 375M | 83% |
FBIZ | FRST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRST's Valuation (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBIZ (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew similarly to FBIZ’s over the last 12 months.
FBIZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRST (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.
FBIZ's SMR Rating (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FRST (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.
FBIZ's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FRST (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.
FBIZ's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRST (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBIZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.
| FBIZ | FRST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | 11 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 6 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GAGPX | 13.31 | 0.28 | +2.15% |
| Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts P | |||
| FEXRX | 15.26 | 0.07 | +0.46% |
| First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity R6 | |||
| CBFAX | 42.62 | 0.19 | +0.45% |
| American Funds Global Balanced 529-A | |||
| OIIEX | 17.96 | 0.05 | +0.28% |
| Optimum International Instl | |||
| ARSTX | 18.30 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Nuveen Small Cap Select I | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIZ has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIZ jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBIZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBIZ | 100% | +4.39% | ||
| MBWM - FBIZ | 84% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| CCNE - FBIZ | 84% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| SHBI - FBIZ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| FMBH - FBIZ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TRMK - FBIZ | 83% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRST has been closely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRST jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRST | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| FISI - FRST | 70% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| HBNC - FRST | 70% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| COFS - FRST | 69% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| BY - FRST | 68% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| FBIZ - FRST | 68% Closely correlated | +4.39% | ||
More | ||||