FBK
Price
$61.40
Change
+$0.66 (+1.09%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.07B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBCF
Price
$35.52
Change
+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Updated
Aug 12, 10:48 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.43B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBK vs SBCF

FBK vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBK vs. SBCF commentary
Aug 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBK is a Buy and SBCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2026
Stock price -- (FBK: $61.40 vs. SBCF: $35.37)
Brand notoriety: FBK and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBK: 52% vs. SBCF: 57%
Market capitalization -- FBK: $3.07B vs. SBCF: $3.43B
FBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.07B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than FBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the short-term than FBK.

Price Growth

FBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($3.43B) has a higher market cap than FBK($3.07B). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than FBK: SBCF (22.97) vs FBK (16.24). SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 13.960 vs. FBK (11.240). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. FBK (160M). FBK has less debt than SBCF: FBK (272M) vs SBCF (888M). FBK (701M) and SBCF (676M) have equivalent revenues.
FBKSBCFFBK / SBCF
Capitalization3.07B3.43B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.24013.96081%
P/E Ratio16.2422.9771%
Revenue701M676M104%
Total Cash160M201M80%
Total Debt272M888M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBK vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
FBK
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2945
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3977
SMR RATING
1..100
3643
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

FBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

FBK's SMR Rating (36) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBK’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

FBK's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBK’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBK (85) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBKSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBHI23.27N/A
+0.02%
iShares iBonds 2029 Term HY & Inc ETF
MMID27.54N/A
N/A
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
QBY6.66-0.01
-0.10%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF
YBTC17.53-0.14
-0.77%
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Cll Strat ETF
CQQQ51.83-1.04
-1.97%
Invesco China Technology ETF

FBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBK has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBK jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBK
1D Price
Change %
FBK100%
+1.44%
UCB - FBK
84%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
UBSI - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
ASB - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
ABCB - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
SBCF - FBK
82%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
More