FBNC
Price
$58.05
Change
-$1.34 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jun 3, 01:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.4B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBCF
Price
$29.30
Change
-$0.90 (-2.98%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.89B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBNC vs SBCF

Header iconFBNC vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts FBNC vs SBCFBanner chart's image
FBNC vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBNC vs. SBCF commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBNC is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FBNC: $59.39 vs. SBCF: $30.20)
Brand notoriety: FBNC and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBNC: 97% vs. SBCF: 91%
Market capitalization -- FBNC: $2.4B vs. SBCF: $2.89B
FBNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.4B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBNC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FBNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBNC is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBNC is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

FBNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.89B) has a higher market cap than FBNC($2.4B). FBNC (20.27) and SBCF (20.27) have similar P/E ratio . FBNC YTD gains are higher at: 17.439 vs. SBCF (-3.273). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. FBNC (138M). FBNC has less debt than SBCF: FBNC (-2.68M) vs SBCF (888M). SBCF has higher revenues than FBNC: SBCF (676M) vs FBNC (400M).
FBNCSBCFFBNC / SBCF
Capitalization2.4B2.89B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.439-3.273-533%
P/E Ratio20.2720.27100%
Revenue400M676M59%
Total Cash138M174M79%
Total Debt-2.68M888M-0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBNC vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
FBNC
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7762
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
4843
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBNC (85). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FBNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (100). This means that FBNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBNC (48). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FBNC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (59). This means that FBNC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBNC (45). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBNCSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDYV92.231.00
+1.10%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md CpValETF
JMSI50.220.15
+0.30%
JPMorgan Sustainable Municipal Inc ETF
MYMK25.000.01
+0.02%
State Street® My2031 Municipal Bond ETF
EUDG38.52-0.03
-0.07%
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF
QBIG42.70-0.21
-0.50%
Invesco Top QQQ ETF

FBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBNC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBNC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBNC
1D Price
Change %
FBNC100%
+2.41%
TRMK - FBNC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
UBSI - FBNC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
UCB - FBNC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
SBCF - FBNC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
TCBK - FBNC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
More