FULT saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on September 17, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 44 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 68%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 17, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FULT as a result. In 48 of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FULT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
The Aroon Indicator for FULT entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FULT's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 17 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FULT advanced for three days, in 183 of 301 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
FULT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 28 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.210) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (11.049) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.270) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.178) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FULT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
SBCF moved below its 50-day moving average on September 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 37 of 51 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 17, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SBCF as a result. In 58 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The 10-day moving average for SBCF crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SBCF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Aroon Indicator for SBCF entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SBCF's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 17 of 21 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 59 cases where SBCF's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +2.67% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SBCF advanced for three days, in 174 of 283 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
SBCF may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 29 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. SBCF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 64 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.154) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (21.143) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.400) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.394) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SBCF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
FULT | SBCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (64). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (80). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (15). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (57). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (37). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.
| FULT | SBCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 59% | 8 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SBCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.
FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
SBCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| APDB | 26.48 | 0.17 | +0.63% |
| Aptus April Deep Buffer ETF (APDB) | |||
| FNDC | 49.74 | 0.24 | +0.48% |
| Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC) | |||
| BDBT | 24.24 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) | |||
| SPXV | 85.29 | 0.11 | +0.13% |
| ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) | |||
| XTRE | 47.91 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FULT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FULT | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| ONB - FULT | 90% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ASB - FULT | 89% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| UBSI - FULT | 89% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| HWC - FULT | 88% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| AUB - FULT | 88% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCF | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| ASB - SBCF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| UBSI - SBCF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| UCB - SBCF | 85% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| AUB - SBCF | 85% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| FULT - SBCF | 85% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||