Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBONX vs FIWBX
FBONX vs FIWBX Comparison
Open Charts FBONX vs FIWBX
FBONX vs FIWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBONX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FIWBX (3.53B). FIWBX pays higher dividends than FBONX: FIWBX (3.79) vs FBONX (2.06). FBONX was incepted earlier than FIWBX: FBONX (6 years) vs FIWBX (8 years). FIWBX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FBONX (0.30). FIWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. FBONX (50.00). FIWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBONX: FIWBX (0) vs FBONX (250). FBONX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. FIWBX (9.83). FBONX return over 5 years is better than : 36.09 vs. FIWBX (31.29).
| FBONX | FIWBX | FBONX / FIWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.77 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.588 | 3.933 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 3.53B | 8,161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 3.79 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 9.83 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.86 | 34.63 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.09 | 31.29 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement