FBPA
Price
$24.78
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
26.85M
MZHOF
Price
$31.90
Change
+$1.70 (+5.63%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
83.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBPA vs MZHOF

Header iconFBPA vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts FBPA vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Farmers Bank of Appomattox (VA)
Price$24.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$330
Capitalization26.85M
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$31.90
Change+$1.70 (+5.63%)
Volume$31
Capitalization83.99B
FBPA vs MZHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBPA vs. MZHOF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBPA is a Hold and MZHOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FBPA: $24.78 vs. MZHOF: $31.90)
Brand notoriety: FBPA and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBPA: 21% vs. MZHOF: 0%
Market capitalization -- FBPA: $26.85M vs. MZHOF: $83.99B
FBPA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.85M. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $83.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBPA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FBPA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the long-term than FBPA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBPA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBPA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MZHOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the short-term than FBPA.

Price Growth

FBPA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($84B) has a higher market cap than FBPA($26.9M). MZHOF has higher P/E ratio than FBPA: MZHOF (13.34) vs FBPA (9.87). MZHOF YTD gains are higher at: 30.738 vs. FBPA (11.791). MZHOF has higher revenues than FBPA: MZHOF (3.61T) vs FBPA (12.1M).
FBPAMZHOFFBPA / MZHOF
Capitalization26.9M84B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.79130.73838%
P/E Ratio9.8713.3474%
Revenue12.1M3.61T0%
Total Cash3.82MN/A-
Total DebtN/A22.19T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBPA vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
FBPA
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9532
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8518
SMR RATING
1..100
701
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MZHOF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPA (80). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBPA (85). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBPA (70). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPA (51). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPA (33). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPAMZHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEAM4.73-0.01
-0.21%
5E Advanced Materials Inc.
DECK102.96-0.90
-0.87%
Deckers Outdoor Corp
SBFM1.49-0.02
-1.33%
Sunshine Biopharma Inc
WAFD30.57-0.49
-1.58%
WaFd
SNDL2.02-0.09
-4.27%
SNDL

FBPA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBPA and MNMB have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBPA and MNMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBPA
1D Price
Change %
FBPA100%
N/A
MNMB - FBPA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHB - FBPA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - FBPA
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
MDIBF - FBPA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - FBPA
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
More