FBPA
Price
$23.50
Change
+$0.24 (+1.03%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
30.34M
MZHOF
Price
$24.69
Change
-$1.11 (-4.30%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
43.65B
Ad is loading...

FBPA vs MZHOF

Header iconFBPA vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts FBPA vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Farmers Bank of Appomattox (VA)
Price$23.50
Change+$0.24 (+1.03%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization30.34M
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$24.69
Change-$1.11 (-4.30%)
Volume$100
Capitalization43.65B
FBPA vs MZHOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBPA vs. MZHOF commentary
Apr 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBPA is a Hold and MZHOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FBPA: $23.50 vs. MZHOF: $24.69)
Brand notoriety: FBPA and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBPA: 71% vs. MZHOF: 1%
Market capitalization -- FBPA: $30.34M vs. MZHOF: $43.65B
FBPA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.34M. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $43.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBPA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBPA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the long-term than FBPA.

Price Growth

FBPA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -14.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-4.81% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($43.6B) has a higher market cap than FBPA($30.3M). MZHOF (9.73) and FBPA (9.62) have similar P/E ratio . FBPA YTD gains are higher at: 6.016 vs. MZHOF (1.189). MZHOF has higher revenues than FBPA: MZHOF (2.67T) vs FBPA (11.7M).
FBPAMZHOFFBPA / MZHOF
Capitalization30.3M43.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.0161.189506%
P/E Ratio9.629.7399%
Revenue11.7M2.67T0%
Total Cash3.82MN/A-
Total DebtN/A19.6T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBPA vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
FBPA
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
471
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2449
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBPA's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (45). This means that FBPA’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBPA (100). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPA (47). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

FBPA's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (51). This means that FBPA’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

FBPA's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (49). This means that FBPA’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFFV22.77-0.41
-1.79%
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
SYLD57.91-2.64
-4.36%
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
CCSO17.61-1.10
-5.89%
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF
OEF244.18-15.37
-5.92%
iShares S&P 100 ETF
EVF5.32-0.37
-6.50%
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust

FBPA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBPA and MNMB have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBPA and MNMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBPA
1D Price
Change %
FBPA100%
N/A
MNMB - FBPA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
MCHB - FBPA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - FBPA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDIBF - FBPA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - FBPA
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
N/A
CCRDF - MZHOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPA - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
ISTR - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More