FCCO
Price
$32.25
Change
-$0.86 (-2.60%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
311.23M
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNSB
Price
$24.80
Change
-$0.30 (-1.20%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
178.74M
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCCO vs MNSB

FCCO vs MNSB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCCO vs. MNSB commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCO is a StrongBuy and MNSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCCO vs MNSB: Fundamental Ratings
FCCO
MNSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7679
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1782
SMR RATING
1..100
4652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNSB's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (55). This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (82). This means that FCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (52). This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (47). This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (41). This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCCOMNSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FCCO: $33.11 vs. MNSB: $25.10)
Brand notoriety: FCCO and MNSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCCO: 92% vs. MNSB: 69%
Market capitalization -- FCCO: $311.23M vs. MNSB: $178.74M
FCCO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $311.23M. MNSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $178.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $172.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MNSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCCO is a better buy in the long-term than MNSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNSB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCCO is a better buy in the short-term than MNSB.

Price Growth

FCCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while MNSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FCCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNRRX83.520.42
+0.51%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R
HNSGX16.970.07
+0.41%
Harbor Small Cap Growth Retirement
BPRGX30.83-0.08
-0.26%
Boston Partners Global Equity R6
VEVRX49.58-0.18
-0.36%
Victory Sycamore Established Value R6
CIMDX16.99-0.10
-0.59%
Clarkston Founders Institutional

FCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCCO has been closely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCCO jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCCO
1D Price
Change %
FCCO100%
-1.13%
IBCP - FCCO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
SMBK - FCCO
76%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
CBAN - FCCO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
THFF - FCCO
75%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
ORRF - FCCO
74%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
More

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been closely correlated with FCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then FCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
+1.74%
FCCO - MNSB
69%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
ORRF - MNSB
68%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
FXNC - MNSB
68%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
IBCP - MNSB
66%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
FBIZ - MNSB
66%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
More