FCF
Price
$20.42
Change
+$0.13 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WAFD
Price
$38.09
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.81B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCF vs WAFD

FCF vs WAFD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCF vs. WAFD commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCF is a Hold and WAFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FCF: $20.42 vs. WAFD: $38.10)
Brand notoriety: FCF and WAFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCF: 86% vs. WAFD: 34%
Market capitalization -- FCF: $2.08B vs. WAFD: $2.81B
FCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. WAFD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than WAFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAFD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WAFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WAFD is a better buy in the short-term than FCF.

Price Growth

FCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while WAFD (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

WAFD is expected to report earnings on Jul 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAFD($2.81B) has a higher market cap than FCF($2.08B). FCF has higher P/E ratio than WAFD: FCF (13.43) vs WAFD (12.49). FCF YTD gains are higher at: 22.912 vs. WAFD (20.830). FCF has less debt than WAFD: FCF (155M) vs WAFD (3.12B). WAFD has higher revenues than FCF: WAFD (763M) vs FCF (538M).
FCFWAFDFCF / WAFD
Capitalization2.08B2.81B74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.91220.830110%
P/E Ratio13.4312.49108%
Revenue538M763M71%
Total Cash103MN/A-
Total Debt155M3.12B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCF vs WAFD: Fundamental Ratings
FCF
WAFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3156
SMR RATING
1..100
4235
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (44) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (56) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's SMR Rating (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFWAFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WAFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BILZ100.76N/A
N/A
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active ETF
PYPG5.86N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF
RODM40.61-0.34
-0.83%
Hartford Multifactor Dev Mkts (exUS) ETF
MSTQ38.51-0.76
-1.93%
LHA Market State™ Tactical Q ETF
CNAV41.98-1.64
-3.77%
Mohr Company Nav ETF

WAFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAFD has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAFD jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAFD
1D Price
Change %
WAFD100%
-0.03%
UBSI - WAFD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
PRK - WAFD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
FRME - WAFD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CATY - WAFD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
FCF - WAFD
79%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More