Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs GSACX
FCHKX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs GSACX
FCHKX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. GSACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. GSACX (32.8M). GSACX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: GSACX (1.32) vs FCHKX (0.67). FCHKX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FCHKX (18 years) vs GSACX (29 years). GSACX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FCHKX (1.92). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FCHKX (250) vs GSACX (1000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.68 vs. GSACX (-4.48). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. GSACX (-32.55).
| FCHKX | GSACX | FCHKX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.21 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 3.10 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.785 | -3.764 | -791% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 32.8M | 8,131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.32 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.68 | -4.48 | -842% |
| Returns for 3 years | 124.22 | 29.94 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | -32.55 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.35 | 11.78 | 1,471% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement