FCNCA
Price
$2111.45
Change
+$26.46 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.21B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$23.66
Change
+$0.61 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.52B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCNCA vs FULT

FCNCA vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCNCA vs. FULT commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNCA is a Hold and FULT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FCNCA: $2086.33 vs. FULT: $23.05)
Brand notoriety: FCNCA and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCNCA: 96% vs. FULT: 76%
Market capitalization -- FCNCA: $23.95B vs. FULT: $4.52B
FCNCA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.95B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCNCA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCNCA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than FCNCA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCNCA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCNCA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCA is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FCNCA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCNCA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNCA($24.2B) has a higher market cap than FULT($4.52B). FCNCA has higher P/E ratio than FULT: FCNCA (12.02) vs FULT (10.98). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 20.369 vs. FCNCA (-2.585). FCNCA has more cash in the bank: 801M vs. FULT (271M). FULT has less debt than FCNCA: FULT (1.25B) vs FCNCA (34.1B). FCNCA has higher revenues than FULT: FCNCA (9.27B) vs FULT (1.33B).
FCNCAFULTFCNCA / FULT
Capitalization24.2B4.52B535%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.58520.369-13%
P/E Ratio12.0210.98110%
Revenue9.27B1.33B698%
Total Cash801M271M296%
Total Debt34.1B1.25B2,721%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCNCA vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FCNCA
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
935
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3043
SMR RATING
1..100
823
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCNCA (76). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCNCA’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (43). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCA's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (23). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCA (49). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FCNCA’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCA's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (47). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNCAFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCNCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WHF6.550.10
+1.63%
WhiteHorse Finance
NMR9.010.04
+0.45%
Nomura Holdings
CURX0.28N/A
-0.86%
Curanex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OSIS219.26-3.52
-1.58%
OSI Systems
CGBD10.73-0.23
-2.05%
Carlyle Secured Lending

FCNCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCA has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCNCA jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCA
1D Price
Change %
FCNCA100%
+0.71%
ZION - FCNCA
77%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
FNB - FCNCA
76%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
ASB - FCNCA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
ONB - FCNCA
72%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
FULT - FCNCA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.66%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
FNB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
ONB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More