FULT
Price
$24.63
Change
+$0.37 (+1.53%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.64B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONB
Price
$26.43
Change
+$0.32 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.99B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs ONB

FULT vs ONB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. ONB commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Hold and ONB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $24.26 vs. ONB: $26.11)
Brand notoriety: FULT and ONB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 78% vs. ONB: 105%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.64B vs. ONB: $9.99B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.64B. ONB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ONB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than ONB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ONB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than ONB.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

ONB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONB($9.99B) has a higher market cap than FULT($4.64B). FULT (11.66) and ONB (11.56) have similar P/E ratio . FULT YTD gains are higher at: 27.690 vs. ONB (18.475). ONB has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. FULT (312M). FULT has less debt than ONB: FULT (1.25B) vs ONB (7.36B). ONB has higher revenues than FULT: ONB (2.74B) vs FULT (1.33B).
FULTONBFULT / ONB
Capitalization4.64B9.99B46%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.69018.475150%
P/E Ratio11.6611.56101%
Revenue1.33B2.74B48%
Total Cash312M537M58%
Total Debt1.25B7.36B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs ONB: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
ONB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7592
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3532
SMR RATING
1..100
2316
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (42). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (35). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (23). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (45). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (61). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTONB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLU19.510.04
+0.20%
Gabelli Utility & Income Trust (The)
CRED23.28N/A
N/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF
DVXB28.31N/A
N/A
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Vol ETF
XVV56.18-0.83
-1.46%
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF
ESGV130.06-2.19
-1.66%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.74%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
UBSI - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More