Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs SLAFX
FCNSX vs SLAFX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs SLAFX
FCNSX vs SLAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. SLAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a Buy and SLAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. SLAFX (385M). SLAFX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: SLAFX (3.66) vs FCNSX (1.13). FCNSX was incepted earlier than SLAFX: FCNSX (9 years) vs SLAFX (34 years). SLAFX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). SLAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. FCNSX (13.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLAFX: FCNSX (0) vs SLAFX (2500). SLAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.40 vs. FCNSX (18.16). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 79.84 vs. SLAFX (53.56).
| FCNSX | SLAFX | FCNSX / SLAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.962 | 16.819 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 385M | 2,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.66 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 28.40 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.49 | 48.52 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.84 | 53.56 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 162.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers