Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs SLARX
FCNSX vs SLARX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs SLARX
FCNSX vs SLARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. SLARX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a Buy and SLARX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. SLARX (385M). SLARX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: SLARX (3.76) vs FCNSX (1.13). FCNSX was incepted earlier than SLARX: FCNSX (9 years) vs SLARX (12 years). SLARX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). SLARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. FCNSX (13.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLARX: FCNSX (0) vs SLARX (1000000). SLARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.38 vs. FCNSX (18.16). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 79.84 vs. SLARX (53.54).
| FCNSX | SLARX | FCNSX / SLARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.32 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.962 | 16.801 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 385M | 2,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.76 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 28.38 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.49 | 48.49 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.84 | 53.54 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 162.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement