Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs SLARX
FCNSX vs SLARX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs SLARX
FCNSX vs SLARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. SLARX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a Buy and SLARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. SLARX (370M). SLARX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: SLARX (3.75) vs FCNSX (1.18). FCNSX was incepted earlier than SLARX: FCNSX (9 years) vs SLARX (12 years). SLARX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). SLARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. FCNSX (13.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLARX: FCNSX (0) vs SLARX (1000000). SLARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.40 vs. FCNSX (27.10). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 87.99 vs. SLARX (45.92).
| FCNSX | SLARX | FCNSX / SLARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.32 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.557 | 10.719 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 370M | 2,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 3.75 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.10 | 30.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.52 | 39.94 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.99 | 45.92 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 140.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement