Ad is loading...
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$61.84
Change-$1.04 (-1.65%)
Volume$115.95K
Net Assets1.52B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$40.36
Change-$0.75 (-1.82%)
Volume$9.98K
Net Assets69.91M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.52B vs. FDCF (69.9M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (6.853) vs FCOM (5.349). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (11 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FCOM has a higher turnover FDCF (17.00) vs FDCF (17.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.349 | 6.853 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 69.9M | 2,176% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 17.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | -4.93% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
More | ||||