Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$70.53
Change+$0.35 (+0.50%)
Volume$918
Net Assets1.81B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$49.71
Change+$0.47 (+0.95%)
Volume$598
Net Assets103.66M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.81B vs. FDCF (104M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (31.310) vs FCOM (20.983). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (12 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 20.983 | 31.310 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 104M | 1,737% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 23.00 | 91% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,700% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| META - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
More | ||||