Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$63.60
Change+$0.84 (+1.34%)
Volume$1.04K
Net Assets1.57B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$43.55
Change+$0.49 (+1.14%)
Volume$224
Net Assets73.54M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and FDCF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.57B vs. FDCF (73.5M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (14.045) vs FCOM (7.439). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (12 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 7.439 | 14.045 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 73.5M | 2,132% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 35.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 0.06 | 1,393% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 14 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| LLYVK - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||