Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$68.26
Change-$0.18 (-0.26%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.76B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$45.53
Change-$0.18 (-0.39%)
Volume$200
Net Assets101.86M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.76B vs. FDCF (102M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (21.075) vs FCOM (17.481). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (12 years) vs FDCF (6 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 17.481 | 21.075 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 102M | 1,726% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 23.00 | 57% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,713% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 22 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| META - FCOM | 84% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| DIS - FCOM | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| META - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
More | ||||