Ad is loading...
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$54.52
Change-$2.12 (-3.74%)
Volume$831
Net Assets1.38B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$35.66
Change-$1.83 (-4.88%)
Volume$200
Net Assets63.53M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.39B vs. FDCF (63.5M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (-0.754) vs FCOM (-3.275). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (11 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | -3.275 | -0.754 | 434% |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 63.5M | 2,181% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 35.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 0.07 | 1,362% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||