Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs GAMR
FCOM vs GAMR Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs GAMR
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$68.75
Change+$1.25 (+1.85%)
Volume$434.94K
Net Assets1.74B
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
Price$89.75
Change+$0.50 (+0.56%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets44.92M
FCOM vs GAMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. GAMR commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and GAMR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.74B vs. GAMR (44.9M). GAMR has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: GAMR (37.138) vs FCOM (18.013). FCOM was incepted earlier than GAMR: FCOM (12 years) vs GAMR (10 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than GAMR (0.59). GAMR has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | GAMR | FCOM / GAMR | |
| Gain YTD | 18.013 | 37.138 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 44.9M | 3,880% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.59 | 14% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 52.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 0.38 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | GAMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 26 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| META - FCOM | 84% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| DIS - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
More | ||||
GAMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GAMR and MSFT have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAMR and MSFT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAMR | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| MSFT - GAMR | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| SOHU - GAMR | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| META - GAMR | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| MOMO - GAMR | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| GOOGL - GAMR | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.53% | ||
More | ||||