Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs GGT
FCOM vs GGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. GGT commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and GGT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.76B vs. GGT (131M). FCOM has a higher annual dividend yield than GGT: FCOM (17.481) vs GGT (5.702). FCOM was incepted earlier than GGT: FCOM (12 years) vs GGT (31 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than GGT (1.70). GGT has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | GGT | FCOM / GGT | |
| Gain YTD | 17.481 | 5.702 | 307% |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 131M | 1,344% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.70 | 5% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 18.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 31 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | GGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| META - FCOM | 84% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| DIS - FCOM | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
GGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GGT and META have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGT and META's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGT | 100% | -2.49% | ||
| META - GGT | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| SONY - GGT | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| AMT - GGT | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| RCI - GGT | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| VIV - GGT | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||