FCOM vs GOOGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and GOOGL is a Hold.
GOOGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 23 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADAVX | 4.43 | -0.03 | -0.69% |
| abrdn Dynamic Dividend A | |||
| SWMIX | 21.27 | -0.17 | -0.79% |
| Schwab International Opportunities | |||
| CAFAX | 42.83 | -0.92 | -2.10% |
| American Funds AMCAP 529A | |||
| HSMBX | 36.50 | -1.01 | -2.69% |
| Horizon Multi-Factor Small/Mid Cap Adv | |||
| FKCSX | 37.48 | -1.17 | -3.03% |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap C | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
GOOGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOGL has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOGL jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 100% | -2.65% | ||
| GOOG - GOOGL | 100% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| SNAP - GOOGL | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.18% | ||
| CARG - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | -17.13% | ||
| META - GOOGL | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| SMWB - GOOGL | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
More | ||||