FCOM vs GOOGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and GOOGL is a Buy.
GOOGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAAGX | 18.81 | -0.04 | -0.21% |
| Thrivent Large Cap Growth A | |||
| MFLDX | 23.84 | -0.12 | -0.50% |
| Cromwell Long Short Institutional | |||
| FCFMX | 19.79 | -0.10 | -0.50% |
| Fidelity Series Total Market Index | |||
| IYSMX | 17.25 | -0.16 | -0.92% |
| Delaware Ivy Smid Cap Core Fund Class R | |||
| RYTFX | 8.16 | -0.10 | -1.21% |
| Royce Small-Cap Total Return Svc | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
GOOGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOGL has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOGL jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| GOOG - GOOGL | 100% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CARG - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| META - GOOGL | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SMWB - GOOGL | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| SNAP - GOOGL | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||