FCOM vs LBRDA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and LBRDA is a Hold.
LBRDA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | LBRDA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 61% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLSA | 36.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | |||
| FJUN | 52.20 | -0.08 | -0.15% |
| FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun | |||
| DJUN | 43.81 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Jun | |||
| SPHQ | 69.47 | -0.32 | -0.46% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF | |||
| PEZ | 105.31 | -1.59 | -1.48% |
| Invesco DW Consumer Cyclicals Momt ETF | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
LBRDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDA has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDA jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDA | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| LBRDK - LBRDA | 100% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| CHTR - LBRDA | 76% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| LBRDB - LBRDA | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| CABO - LBRDA | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||