FCOM vs LBRDA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and LBRDA is a Hold.
LBRDA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | LBRDA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 14 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPV | 34.48 | 0.35 | +1.01% |
| ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | |||
| JHMB | 21.75 | 0.10 | +0.46% |
| JHancock Mortgage Backed Sec ETF | |||
| BKLN | 21.04 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Invesco Senior Loan ETF | |||
| WOOD | 79.05 | -1.05 | -1.31% |
| iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | |||
| VIOG | 114.63 | -3.83 | -3.23% |
| Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
LBRDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDA has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDA jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDA | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| LBRDK - LBRDA | 100% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| CHTR - LBRDA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| LBRDB - LBRDA | 66% Closely correlated | +6.77% | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| CABO - LBRDA | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||