Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPAX vs RERCX
FCPAX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCPAX vs RERCX
FCPAX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPAX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPAX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCPAX (18.3B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FCPAX: RERCX (2.38) vs FCPAX (0.39). FCPAX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCPAX (29 years) vs RERCX (24 years). FCPAX (1.14) and RERCX (1.12) have similar cost to investors . FCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). FCPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FCPAX (0) vs RERCX (250). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. FCPAX (2.25). FCPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.03 vs. RERCX (-6.43).
| FCPAX | RERCX | FCPAX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.12 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.12 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.838 | 6.467 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 140B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 2.38 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | 3.80 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.19 | 26.39 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.03 | -6.43 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.44 | 44.13 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement