Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPVX vs SSGSX
FCPVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCPVX vs SSGSX
FCPVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCPVX has more cash in the bank: 5.47B vs. SSGSX (4.1B). FCPVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FCPVX (0.84) vs SSGSX (0.52). FCPVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCPVX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FCPVX (0.91). FCPVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). FCPVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCPVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). FCPVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. SSGSX (8.91). FCPVX return over 5 years is better than : 21.86 vs. SSGSX (-2.55).
| FCPVX | SSGSX | FCPVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.23 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.23 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.400 | 15.641 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.47B | 4.1B | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.52 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 8.91 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.09 | 12.96 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.86 | -2.55 | -858% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.45 | 35.89 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement