Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPVX vs SSGSX
FCPVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCPVX vs SSGSX
FCPVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCPVX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. SSGSX (4.67B). FCPVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FCPVX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.54). FCPVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCPVX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FCPVX (0.91). FCPVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). FCPVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCPVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). FCPVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.06 vs. SSGSX (24.64). FCPVX return over 5 years is better than : 18.25 vs. SSGSX (-2.55).
| FCPVX | SSGSX | FCPVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.23 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.23 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.500 | 18.013 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 4.67B | 110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.54 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.06 | 24.64 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.24 | 17.79 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.25 | -2.55 | -716% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.41 | 48.33 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement