Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs MCAMX
FCQAX vs MCAMX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs MCAMX
FCQAX vs MCAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. MCAMX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and MCAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. MCAMX (1.32B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than MCAMX: FCQAX (4.16) vs MCAMX (2.88). FCQAX was incepted earlier than MCAMX: FCQAX (8 years) vs MCAMX (6 years). MCAMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FCQAX (0.80). MCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCQAX (13.89). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCAMX: FCQAX (1000) vs MCAMX (2500). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. MCAMX (6.26). MCAMX return over 5 years is better than : -0.50 vs. FCQAX (-1.69).
| FCQAX | MCAMX | FCQAX / MCAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.18 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.19 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.946 | 1.508 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 1.32B | 250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 2.88 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 6.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.94 | 10.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.69 | -0.50 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement