Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs NSOPX
FCSDX vs NSOPX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs NSOPX
FCSDX vs NSOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. NSOPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Hold and NSOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.76B vs. NSOPX (147M). FCSDX pays higher dividends than NSOPX: FCSDX (1.41) vs NSOPX (0.94). FCSDX was incepted earlier than NSOPX: FCSDX (22 years) vs NSOPX (14 years). FCSDX (1.67) and NSOPX (1.63) have similar cost to investors . FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NSOPX (25.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSOPX: FCSDX (0) vs NSOPX (2500). NSOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.15 vs. FCSDX (15.89). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.20 vs. NSOPX (10.20).
| FCSDX | NSOPX | FCSDX / NSOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.56 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.63 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.628 | 9.137 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 147M | 3,918% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.94 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | 23.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.02 | 34.42 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.20 | 10.20 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.16 | 94.01 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement