Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSRX vs HBLIX
FCSRX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FCSRX vs HBLIX
FCSRX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSRX vs. HBLIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSRX is a Hold and HBLIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FCSRX (542M). FCSRX pays higher dividends than HBLIX: FCSRX (3.62) vs HBLIX (3.34). FCSRX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FCSRX (21 years) vs HBLIX (17 years). FCSRX (1.78) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.66). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FCSRX (29.00). FCSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FCSRX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FCSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. HBLIX (1.45). FCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.82 vs. HBLIX (5.88).
| FCSRX | HBLIX | FCSRX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.66 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.66 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.133 | 4.261 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 542M | 10.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 3.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 1.45 | 884% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 20.68 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.82 | 5.88 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.13 | 42.03 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement