Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSRX vs HBLRX
FCSRX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSRX vs HBLRX
FCSRX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSRX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSRX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FCSRX (542M). FCSRX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FCSRX (3.62) vs HBLRX (2.74). FCSRX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FCSRX (21 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). FCSRX (1.78) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FCSRX (29.00). FCSRX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. HBLRX (0.88). FCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.82 vs. HBLRX (2.74).
| FCSRX | HBLRX | FCSRX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.27 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.27 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.133 | 3.850 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 542M | 10.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 2.74 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 0.88 | 1,452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 18.49 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.82 | 2.74 | 1,052% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.13 | 34.74 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement