Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCVAX vs SSGSX
FCVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCVAX vs SSGSX
FCVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCVAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCVAX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. SSGSX (4.67B). FCVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FCVAX (0.70) vs SSGSX (0.54). FCVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCVAX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and FCVAX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . FCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). FCVAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCVAX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). FCVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. SSGSX (24.64). FCVAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. SSGSX (-2.55).
| FCVAX | SSGSX | FCVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.333 | 18.013 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 4.67B | 110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.54 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 24.64 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.03 | 17.79 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.42 | -2.55 | -605% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.21 | 48.33 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement