Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCVAX vs SSGSX
FCVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCVAX vs SSGSX
FCVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCVAX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCVAX has more cash in the bank: 5.47B vs. SSGSX (4.5B). FCVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FCVAX (0.66) vs SSGSX (0.52). FCVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCVAX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and FCVAX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . FCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). FCVAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCVAX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). FCVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.42 vs. SSGSX (17.08). FCVAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.60 vs. SSGSX (-0.48).
| FCVAX | SSGSX | FCVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.698 | 21.369 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.47B | 4.5B | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.52 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.42 | 17.08 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.56 | 14.09 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.60 | -0.48 | -3,855% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.13 | 40.12 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement