Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs XLC
FDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLC
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$47.28
Change+$0.35 (+0.75%)
Volume$105
Net Assets104.01M
State Street® CommServSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$115.31
Change+$0.46 (+0.40%)
Volume$4.62K
Net Assets26.19B
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Dec 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Buy and XLC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 26.2B vs. FDCF (104M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FDCF (24.299) vs XLC (19.690). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (6 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). XLC has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
| FDCF | XLC | FDCF / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 24.299 | 19.690 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 104M | 26.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 25.00 | 92% |
| Yield | 0.03 | 1.05 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 13 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TVE | 24.14 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| LVHI | 36.81 | -0.14 | -0.38% |
| Franklin Intl Low Volatility Hi Div ETF | |||
| SSPY | 87.28 | -0.62 | -0.71% |
| Stratified LargeCap Index ETF | |||
| DFP | 21.19 | -0.16 | -0.75% |
| FLAHERTY & CRUMRINE DYNAMIC PREFERRED AND Income FUND | |||
| FPRO | 22.56 | -0.28 | -1.23% |
| Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | |||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| META - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| META - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| DIS - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||