Ad is loading...
FDCF vs XLC
FDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLC
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$38.32
Change+$0.39 (+1.03%)
Volume$9.54K
CapitalizationN/A
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$97.94
Change+$0.51 (+0.52%)
Volume$67.74K
CapitalizationN/A
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 20.4B vs. FDCF (57.8M). XLC has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: XLC (35.954) vs FDCF (29.994). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (5 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC has a higher turnover FDCF (17.00) vs FDCF (17.00).
| FDCF | XLC | FDCF / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 29.994 | 35.954 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 57.8M | 20.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 28.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.81 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||