Ad is loading...
FDCF vs XLC
FDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLC
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$35.75
Change+$3.37 (+10.41%)
Volume$800
Net Assets55.36M
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$93.67
Change+$7.54 (+8.75%)
Volume$48.74K
Net Assets17.64B
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 17.6B vs. FDCF (55.4M). XLC has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: XLC (-10.769) vs FDCF (-14.274). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (5 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover XLC (28.00) vs XLC (28.00).
| FDCF | XLC | FDCF / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | -14.274 | -10.769 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 55.4M | 17.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 28.00 | 125% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 1.07 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -1.40% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||