Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs FSCPX
FDLSX vs FSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs FSCPX
FDLSX vs FSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. FSCPX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Hold and FSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 713M vs. FDLSX (482M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: FDLSX (0.52) vs FSCPX (0.04). FDLSX was incepted earlier than FSCPX: FDLSX (42 years) vs FSCPX (36 years). FSCPX (0.69) and FDLSX (0.68) have similar cost to investors . FDLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FDLSX (0) and FSCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDLSX (500) and FSCPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.43 vs. FDLSX (-25.54). FSCPX return over 5 years is better than : -13.39 vs. FDLSX (-18.42).
| FDLSX | FSCPX | FDLSX / FSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.085 | -10.156 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 482M | 713M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.04 | 1,294% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.54 | -12.43 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.68 | 13.42 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.42 | -13.39 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.64 | 78.33 | 28% |