Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$19.59
Change-$0.42 (-2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets618.3M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$82.94
Change-$1.64 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.04M
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 618M vs. RYLAX (9.04M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FDLSX: RYLAX (0.51) vs FDLSX (0.39). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (41 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FDLSX (43.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.54 vs. FDLSX (5.64). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 61.28 vs. RYLAX (49.74).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.580 | 5.488 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 618M | 9.04M | 6,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.51 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 20.54 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.08 | 46.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.28 | 49.74 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.04 | 55.00 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement