Ad is loading...
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$18.33
Change+$0.31 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.11M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$76.81
Change+$1.18 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.3M
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 638M vs. RYLAX (9.3M). FDLSX (0.51) and RYLAX (0.51) have matching dividends . FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (41 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FDLSX (39.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. FDLSX (-3.44). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 59.11 vs. RYLAX (46.88).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.269 | -5.675 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 638M | 9.3M | 6,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.51 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 8.38 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.39 | 16.41 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.11 | 46.88 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.65 | 38.02 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...