Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$21.53
Change+$0.24 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets690.93M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$89.77
Change+$0.14 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.06M
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 691M vs. RYLAX (13.1M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FDLSX: RYLAX (0.45) vs FDLSX (0.35). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (41 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FDLSX (43.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.06 vs. FDLSX (17.02). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.31 vs. RYLAX (44.97).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.651 | 11.786 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 691M | 13.1M | 5,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.02 | 30.06 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.77 | 56.53 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.31 | 44.97 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.36 | 62.97 | 82% |