Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Hold and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 482M vs. RYLAX (4.82M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FDLSX (0.52) vs RYLAX (0.07). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (42 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.68). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FDLSX (65.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.12 vs. FDLSX (-25.54). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -6.59 vs. FDLSX (-18.42).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.085 | -5.670 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 482M | 4.82M | 10,002% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.07 | 790% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.54 | -10.12 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.68 | 26.50 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.42 | -6.59 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.64 | 53.62 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement