Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 495M vs. RYLAX (6.17M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FDLSX (0.52) vs RYLAX (0.07). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (42 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.68). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FDLSX (65.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.72 vs. FDLSX (-22.53). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -4.77 vs. FDLSX (-10.15).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.63 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.68 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.453 | -2.847 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 495M | 6.17M | 8,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.07 | 780% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.53 | -5.72 | 394% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.01 | 24.58 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.15 | -4.77 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 54.62 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement