Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 477M vs. RYLAX (6.1M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FDLSX (0.55) vs RYLAX (0.07). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (42 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.68). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FDLSX (65.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.13 vs. FDLSX (-19.60). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.76 vs. FDLSX (-13.43).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.63 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.68 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.818 | -5.073 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 477M | 6.1M | 7,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.07 | 808% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.60 | -4.13 | 474% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.90 | 30.08 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.43 | -9.76 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.90 | 59.07 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement